Lucky Dogs

[Woody's Janitor]

They were lucky to win. They better get their heads out of their rears if they want to win the SEC.

[Mechanicaldawg]

Come on Teddy! Yea, it was certainly close and there were some rough spots.

Greene wasn't settled I think was the biggest problem.

However, the defense was awsome against a much improved South Carolina team.

And there is not a more hostile, noisy environment, except maybe Baton Rouge!

Any win on the road in the SEC is a major accomplishment!

GO DAWGS!!!

BTW, #10 & #17 can flat lay the leather!!! :speechles :bounce: :cool:

[Timberman]

A W is a W and I seen some hits tonite that were unreal. :clap:

[hpurvis]

GA took control midway the 2nd qtr and it was all over but the shouting.

[Snakeman]

It sounded (had to listen on the radio, a South Carolina station at that) like there were a few anxious moments late in the fourth quarter. The Chickens had the ball twice inside the 30 yard line with a first down, but couldn't score. (Sounds a lot like the Bulldogs, don't it?)

The Snakeman

[gabuckeye]

Timberman is right - a win is a win. S.C. seems to be a tough team.

Go Dawgs! :D

[HT2]

Lucky?????

Maybe.....

But "A WIN IS A WIN IS A WIN"!!!!!!!!!!

All that matters is what number is in the left side of the "WIN/LOSS" Box...... :)

[Greg Tench]

South Carolina has always been tough in Columbia.2 yrs ago was a battle as well, Carolina had the ball inside the 5 late,with a chance to win but fumbled the ball. Like Jeff said, on the road in the sec is a tough row to hoe!! ;)

[Woody's Janitor]

Maybe my expectations are to high for a No.3 ranked team. There is a difference between a tough game on the road and sloppy play. I saw a QB who was not having a good night, receivers dropping the ball, poor tackling and penalties at crucial situations. Am I glad they won...Yes, am I happy with their play......NO!

[HT2]

It's only the "2nd" game......

I'm sure Richt will get all the "kinks" worked out they'll be fine........

Unfortunately...... :p ;)