BANDERSNATCH
Senior Member
Years ago, (94 I believe) a group of scientists got together to calculate what the minimum amount of genes that the "simplest" self-replicating cell would require to survive. One of the simplest and most studied cells belong to a bacterium with over 400 genes. They cut and tweaked this genome down to the bare minimum, but admitted that this hypothetical organism would have MAJOR problems surviving, since it couldn't repair DNA damage, digest complex compounds, etc. How many genes did they come up with? OVER 250!!!! (You go, Designer!!!)
What this implies to me is this.....
There was no self-replicating cell with 50 genes....or 100....or 150....or even 200 genes. It needed over 250 to survive.
To imagine a cell with anything less is to have blind faith in science.
What this implies to me is this.....
There was no self-replicating cell with 50 genes....or 100....or 150....or even 200 genes. It needed over 250 to survive.
To imagine a cell with anything less is to have blind faith in science.