Artfuldodger
Senior Member
I was thinking how God had His salvation plan which was an answer to the Law plan. One can still try and follow the Law plan if you like.
Anyway the Law was to show us that we were too evil to keep it. It was just to show us the real plan. A shadow of Jesus.
That man is not righteous enough to keep law. That we needed our righteousness imputed.
Considering how hard the Law plan was, wouldn't it stand to reason the real salvation plan would be easy? Wasn't part of the allure that it was easy? That Christ had done the hard part? That all we had to do was accept his his suffering?
Christ did the suffering. The hard part. The yoke. The slavery. The legalism. The ceremonies. The rituals. The restrictions. The circumcisions.
If the Law was hard, wouldn't the Grace plan be easy for us? Otherwise, Jesus didn't do the hard part. His blood was shed for nothing. We could just try and save ourselves.
Anyway the Law was to show us that we were too evil to keep it. It was just to show us the real plan. A shadow of Jesus.
That man is not righteous enough to keep law. That we needed our righteousness imputed.
Considering how hard the Law plan was, wouldn't it stand to reason the real salvation plan would be easy? Wasn't part of the allure that it was easy? That Christ had done the hard part? That all we had to do was accept his his suffering?
Christ did the suffering. The hard part. The yoke. The slavery. The legalism. The ceremonies. The rituals. The restrictions. The circumcisions.
If the Law was hard, wouldn't the Grace plan be easy for us? Otherwise, Jesus didn't do the hard part. His blood was shed for nothing. We could just try and save ourselves.
Last edited: