Originally Posted by puddlehunter
Interesting view point.
Yes they could have, and that an interesting pro drug viewpoint as well. But they chose to use drugs as the vehicle to profit enough to terrorize the country.
What if they had chosen to work at McDonald's to fund their project?
Would this have made the bombing any better or worse?
Would the cops have opened fire upon the suspects?
The bombing isn't bad enough, somebody always has to twist the facts and insert untruths, to the point that there is little sympathy left for the victims.
Who confessed to selling enough dope to fund the $76.34 pressure cooker bomb?
How many times were these bombers arrested for selling DOPE?
News FLASH! CNBC just posted this AM, an article about the sale of AR type rifles. "The type weapon that was used at Sandy Hook". Oh that's right, there was one used for a picture.
Why would anybody with one eye and a half of a brain, believe anything that the mass media publishes?
Now if word on the street was that these two cats had been slinging smack and crack, then there might be some truth.
Why not just say they were dealing in illegal Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms? I guess you could add drugs to further push the agenda.