Killer Kyle
Senior Member
I don't know who the landowner is, and I didn't look on the White Co tax assessor's page like I normally would because last time I checked the page, you couldn't search a property owner by way of selecting the parcel on a map, and I don't know the address to the property. In the majority of counties you can search by parcel map but I'm guessing maybe white counties gets too convoluted or something. I really don't know why. But I did some digging today, and some communication, and I did find out some information. When I get home tonight, I will post the E-mail correspondence I had earlier today. I did find out that the USFS is aware of the issue, and it is presently "under review" at the legal Dept of the forest supervisors office. I was not informed whether or not there was a legal or agreed upon easement, but was made aware that the land owner informed the USFS he will no longer be allowing access by means of his property. I was informed that he also had the backing of the local Representative, so I imagine that this will resolve in his favor. Be it so, it his right, despite public objection, but resulting dissent is also warranted I believe. If access is granted for a century and a half, and then ripped away, I can understand some sore feelings, bus his wishes must be respected. I was informed that the process of resolution has gone unattended in the wake of more immediate matters (the wildfires), and was encouraged to contact the forest supervisor Becky Jewitt (sp?) because the contact I spoke with is also a supporter of continued access to the trail and also is eager to hear the outcome.
I did see on the map where the USFS could fairly easily create an alternate approach trail that circumnavigates the property boundaries, and I can present the idea, but we all well know that would cause a reallocation of funds, and plainly stated, that won't happen. Maybe if the public could generate enough interest, we could at least show that it would be important to us.
I did see on the map where the USFS could fairly easily create an alternate approach trail that circumnavigates the property boundaries, and I can present the idea, but we all well know that would cause a reallocation of funds, and plainly stated, that won't happen. Maybe if the public could generate enough interest, we could at least show that it would be important to us.