Big Bang from a Big Bounce?

ambush80

Senior Member
The use of the words "could" and "might have" will be used by believers to try to show that science is useless instead of recognizing that uncertainty is the strength of science.
 

JB0704

I Gots Goats
"Could'a" and "might'a" can also be used to present any explanation of any event for which there is no witnesses? Not to attack the article, just the notion that it's ok to say those things only if you are a scientist.
 

ambush80

Senior Member

ambush80

Senior Member
"Could'a" and "might'a" can also be used to present any explanation of any event for which there is no witnesses? Not to attack the article, just the notion that it's ok to say those things only if you are a scientist.

I was having a conversation with my daughter about Tarot Cards as we sat in the drive through at Chik Fil A . The conversation turned to probability. She agreed that for practical purposes we can say that it is true that if you drop a rock it will always fall down. She also understood that in the realm of possibilities a rock might fall up. Some people want to call that sort of data analysis faith

That's what you have to do if there are no witnesses. You have to try to figure out what happened forensically.
 
Last edited:

ambush80

Senior Member
"Could'a" and "might'a" can also be used to present any explanation of any event for which there is no witnesses? Not to attack the article, just the notion that it's ok to say those things only if you are a scientist.

It's ok for anyone to say those things....except for a preacher.
 

hobbs27

Senior Member
Are you unsure there is a God?
Uncertainty and faith do not seem to go hand in hand.

Do you have no faith in science?
 

hummerpoo

Gone but not forgotten
The use of the words "could" and "might have" will be used by believers to try to show that science is useless instead of recognizing that uncertainty is the strength of science.

This believer is always gratified when he sees good reports like this one. The rub is that experience shows that within 2 yrs. someone will put this report in a textbook without the qualifiers; within two months it will be in a TV documentary without the qualifiers; within two weeks it will be used as background in a news report without the qualifiers; and it's probably already on several websites, and forums, without the qualifiers. (Good to see that this not one of them).

LOL ... Anybody up for starting a pool on the date of the showing of a sitcom pilot titled "Big Bounce Theory".
 

Israel

BANNED
What's your definition of faith? If you use Webster's definition, then, no.
Uncertainty must reign until we are thoroughly disabused of all done in our own certainty. (read repentance)
 
Last edited:

EverGreen1231

Senior Member
The use of the words "could" and "might have" will be used by believers to try to show that science is useless instead of recognizing that uncertainty is the strength of science.

As people who know very little science will postulate about its strengths.
 

hummerpoo

Gone but not forgotten

Is this the end of the article: "Science is not just one “faith community” among many. It has earned its epistemological stripes. And when the stakes are high, as they are with climate change and vaccines, we should appreciate its special status."

I looked, but couldn't find any more; like his discussion of pier review in "faith communities" other than the physical sciences.
 
Top