drippin' rock
Senior Member
Whoa guys, be careful. I think the correct title is "Appalachian -American Sasquatch"
Ain't real and we ain't gonna see one!
To those who have seen a Bigfoot(Or several) there is Undeniable Proof.............
We ALL know there are 1000's of reports dating back a few hundred years.............So, either every single one of them are false, or Bigfoot is REAL
(Note I am not mentioning the Black Panther in this cause even I "Dont Think So")
It only takes one But I am of the belief that there are Many encounters that are Real, hence, the Bigfoot IS REAL At least in MHO
Newspapers back in the 19th century were often intensely competitive and it was quite common for them to fabricate outlandish and/or bizarre stories in order to capture more of the 'market share'...
Suddenly your imaginary friend goes from being a big monkey wandering around your trailer park peeking in your windows and hollering all night and turns him into a highly evolved, (close to human actually) bi-pedal primate with a complex culture augmented with elaborate ritualistic practices. Conceptionally, this would have to include fuctional language skills, advance tool construction and use, intricate social interaction, etc. etc. According to all the bigfoot folks, this thing hasn't even evolved enough to figure out he needs to wash his hind end every once and awhile so people ain't a smelling him from a mile away.
Anyone want to read an 1839 article from the Boston Daily Times?
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/stories/captured_wildman1839.htm
I guess it's not significant that the date of the article is April 1st.................
you do realize that monkeys have been known to "Peek" in windows beacuse they are curious, even tho they have advanced language skills, tool construction, and use social interaction. and did u ever think maybe the smell is to warn away predators or something?
I guess it's not significant that the date of the article is April 1st.................
Come on now BobKat... you are taking "reaching for some proof" to a whole new level here? First of all, you have done cost me some sleep tonight cause I done know I'll be a laying there for a spell a thinking about monkeys peeking in my windows at me... I ain't took my shower yet either! (I can't stand the thought of a monkey a seeing me nekkid' for some reason?) thanks for the new "phobia"....
Anyhow, all kinds of creatures "have been known" to be peekers. From little frogs to coons to house cats (where do you think the term 'peeping tom' comes from**) I ain't sure where this is leading anyhow but whether or not they actually realize the window is even part of the equation or they are curious about the reflections, it is just conjecture anyhow... at least until ya'll catch a talking bigfoot. Which as far as modern science and about 4000 national geographic specials I have watched since the invention of cable tv, there is absolutely no evidence of any primate what so ever (other than those very few believed to have existed in the most recent stages within the evolutionary developement of modern humans - if you subscribe to that sort of theorum) that has ever exhibited any behaviours that could even be remotely associated with advanced language skills, tool construction, or any form of complex social interaction.
We ain't talking about hooting and hollering or sticking a twig in an ant mound here... and the 'social' interaction among monkeys? These are all traits common within the animal kingdom to various degrees, none of which are considered to be anywhere near the level of what we are approaching by hypothesising that bigfeets bury their dead.
Lastly... just what predators have we got running around eating bigfoots? Especially to the point that they have evolved 'super stinky glands' in defense. (please don't say coyotes) Whatever is preying on an 8 to 10 foot tall, quarter ton plus, bipedal, giant, hairy monkey... well? When the bigfooters find proof of whatever that is I'm moving to town anyhow! Besides, the very fact that they do stink would be counter-productive to their 'alledged' incredible ability to remain undetected all these years.
So in answer to your question... no sir I have never even for one second considered that something like a bigfoot would have to resort to stinking real bad for a defense mechanism. Why? Because it's ridiculous probably?
** (like most bigfoot evidence, this is totally made up... by me, it sounded kinda logical though?)
Lastly... just what predators have we got running around eating bigfoots? Especially to the point that they have evolved 'super stinky glands' in defense. (please don't say coyotes) Whatever is preying on an 8 to 10 foot tall, quarter ton plus, bipedal, giant, hairy monkey... well? When the bigfooters find proof of whatever that is I'm moving to town anyhow! Besides, the very fact that they do stink would be counter-productive to their 'alledged' incredible ability to remain undetected all these years.
BULLBUTTER! This is the same old sad dance over again... there is only a small handful of reports that could even be remotely called credible... there is ZERO legitimate, indisputable, evidence of any such creature... and prior to European contact, there is only a couple of tribal folk tales in all of N America that can be even remotely correlated (and it's a real stretch at that) with what is generally described as a modern bigfoot (according to believers)...
there is ZERO legitimate, indisputable, evidence of any such creature...
I wonder if there are blonde bigfoots or is it bigfeets?
I believe there are...............at least I hope so
I always heard it and like it to be Bigfoot, even when plural; like Deer, Fish, etc
Not too happy to hear Matt Moneymaker call them Bigfoots
i just dont see how there can be, so many sightings and one not be real. theres no way, and they have found tracks and hair so yeah theres got to be something. not to mention pictures and video. we should be hunting bigfoot not black panthers
I watched Swamp People last night, and Terrel and his wife went into the swamp to find the swamp monster. They did say they didnt know what it was and they never called it bigfoot, but they did have a video of a big man like hairy something that her dad had taken a video of years ago.
I watched Swamp People last night, and Terrel and his wife went into the swamp to find the swamp monster. They did say they didnt know what it was and they never called it bigfoot, but they did have a video of a big man like hairy something that her dad had taken a video of years ago.
That was pretty funny... you could almost hear the collective moan reverbate across the country as bigfoot enthusiasts everywhere watched their hero violating one of there 'super-duper bigfoot club' rules.
Me personally? I say 'bigfeets'... it just sounds right?
Come on now BobKat... you are taking "reaching for some proof" to a whole new level here? First of all, you have done cost me some sleep tonight cause I done know I'll be a laying there for a spell a thinking about monkeys peeking in my windows at me... I ain't took my shower yet either! (I can't stand the thought of a monkey a seeing me nekkid' for some reason?) thanks for the new "phobia"....
Anyhow, all kinds of creatures "have been known" to be peekers. From little frogs to coons to house cats (where do you think the term 'peeping tom' comes from**) I ain't sure where this is leading anyhow but whether or not they actually realize the window is even part of the equation or they are curious about the reflections, it is just conjecture anyhow... at least until ya'll catch a talking bigfoot. Which as far as modern science and about 4000 national geographic specials I have watched since the invention of cable tv, there is absolutely no evidence of any primate what so ever (other than those very few believed to have existed in the most recent stages within the evolutionary developement of modern humans - if you subscribe to that sort of theorum) that has ever exhibited any behaviours that could even be remotely associated with advanced language skills, tool construction, or any form of complex social interaction.
We ain't talking about hooting and hollering or sticking a twig in an ant mound here... and the 'social' interaction among monkeys? These are all traits common within the animal kingdom to various degrees, none of which are considered to be anywhere near the level of what we are approaching by hypothesising that bigfeets bury their dead.
Lastly... just what predators have we got running around eating bigfoots? Especially to the point that they have evolved 'super stinky glands' in defense. (please don't say coyotes) Whatever is preying on an 8 to 10 foot tall, quarter ton plus, bipedal, giant, hairy monkey... well? When the bigfooters find proof of whatever that is I'm moving to town anyhow! Besides, the very fact that they do stink would be counter-productive to their 'alledged' incredible ability to remain undetected all these years.
So in answer to your question... no sir I have never even for one second considered that something like a bigfoot would have to resort to stinking real bad for a defense mechanism. Why? Because it's ridiculous probably?
** (like most bigfoot evidence, this is totally made up... by me, it sounded kinda logical though?)
What vitriol you have for our hairy friend - one wonders why? I suspect an early childhood trama where one peeked at you in the shower and saw you nekkid.
Me - my phobia ain't some giant monkey watching through the window. But one of them little froggies - yikes!
As far as burying their dead- I consider that a good thing. If they stink so bad alive, can you imagine how they smell dead and rotting in the sun?
Just try and be gentle in your attacks - some folks are sensitive to them.
View attachment 605310