I don't think its worth it on live animals since the shaft is following a 1.5" hole from the broadhead.
And its difficult to get inserts/outserts to work half the time. Stick with standard.[/QUOTE
Tissue is elastic And does not leave a 1.5 inch gaping hole straight through the deer, and the shaft will follow at a different angle to the broad head, meaning plenty of friction on the shaft through the hole.
You will get more penetration with smaller diameter arrows, plenty of test out there to prove it. Usually in the range of 2-4 inches. That being said I would not make the switch if I was already set up with standard diameter arrows. Either one should be a pass through anyway depending on your set up. Another factor to consider with a smaller diameter shaft is less wind diflection.
I don't think its worth it on live animals since the shaft is following a 1.5" hole from the broadhead.
And its difficult to get inserts/outserts to work half the time. Stick with standard.[/QUOTE
Tissue is elastic And does not leave a 1.5 inch gaping hole straight through the deer, and the shaft will follow at a different angle to the broad head, meaning plenty of friction on the shaft through the hole.
You will get more penetration with smaller diameter arrows, plenty of test out there to prove it. Usually in the range of 2-4 inches. That being said I would not make the switch if I was already set up with standard diameter arrows. Either one should be a pass through anyway depending on your set up. Another factor to consider with a smaller diameter shaft is less wind diflection.
Can you link me any tests on game, and not a target? I've never seen any on animals, only foam, hole closing targets, which doesn't mean anything to me.
