Miguel Cervantes
Jedi Master
On a good day he adds Glory to it as long as I don't accuse of him of thinking about the Glory land
That is where the etymology of a word comes in handy.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/glory
On a good day he adds Glory to it as long as I don't accuse of him of thinking about the Glory land
Hey, if you say you have no precepts that guide your morality, your relationships with others, or your outlook on life who am I to argue.
In fact, you just highlighted my point that there is nothing in Atheism that would deter anyone from slaughtering innocents, absolutely nothing. It stands in stark contrast to Christianity.
I said atheism has no moral precepts. That doesn't mean atheists have no moral precepts. It just means whatever morals they hold are not from atheism. Like I said before, atheism is amoral, Christianity is immoral. Not holding a belief in gods does not preclude one from having good morals, bad morals, no morals at all, or anything in between.
I hope for your sake you aren't really as dense as you are making yourself look.
Christianity is immoral.
Are you telling me that you don’t realize that when you state “There is no God.” that you must now determine what precepts you are going to lead your life by given “There is no God” . Is that what you are telling me?
Please elaborate
Vicarious redemption, blood sacrifice for redemption, redemption by way of the murder of an innocent man, the idea that eternal torture or bliss should depend on superstitious belief rather than ones character and actions, the idea of eternal punishment for finite deeds, the idea of original sin, and so on.
“The story of the redemption will not stand examination. That man should redeem himself from the sin of eating an apple by committing a murder on Jesus Christ, is the strangest system of religion ever set up.”
— Thomas Paine
Obviously he is clueless about what he doesn't understand.
Enlighten us about understanding facts compared to using belief as fact.
What is not understood?
You really think eating an apple is sin and killing an innocent man is what religion is built on?
Actually if you remove the "apple".....the backbone of the atheist wouldn't exist.What part of christianity does those two events play in christianity?
Take them away and the backbone of the religion changes.
“The story of the redemption will not stand examination. That man should redeem himself from the sin of eating an apple by committing a murder on Jesus Christ, is the strangest system of religion ever set up.”
— Thomas Paine
Actually if you remove the "apple".....the backbone of the atheist wouldn't exist.
Eating of the forbidden fruit was not the problem. It was the deception that led to disobedience.
If you don't fully understand and believe the God Head, then you will not grasp anything to do with Jesus and the cross.
Gentiles do not sacrifice anything. The Jews did a blood sacrifice, through the cross all of that was ended. The Jews rejected Jesus, Gentiles didn't. You can't lump everything into Christianity or religion. At the end of the day, you're either a Jew or Gentile.
There's a lot of Jewish ceremonies still today involving slaughtering something and not eating certain foods. Their refusal to accept what happened at the cross doesn't imply anything that "Christianity" is.
Could this, perhaps, be an appropriate place to resurrect the intellectual honesty topic? Just asking.
Yes.
Specifically to what?
Explain the apple/atheist claim.