ambush80
Senior Member
@Isreal
But really, I thought this post, indeed the whole thread on the Sam Harris Forum is interesting:
EN - 24 October 2017 08:18 AM
1. “I do not hold that God is “supernatural”. It is my understanding that God is “nature”, to nature’s fullest extent.”
GAD - 24 October 2017 09:23 AM
Right out of the gate this is completely meaningless.
bbearren - 24 October 2017 01:07 PM
Why would it not be?
GAD-Posted: 24 October 2017 20:06
Indeed, why would it not be meaningless. It’s the dreamer dreaming of dreamers who dream of the dreamer dreaming of them dreaming of himself. It’s an infinite circular loop where the dreamers and the dreams are one and the same i.e. nature is the dream and the dream is nature and god is nature and nature is god which makes everything god and god everything which makes us god dreaming we are god dreaming of ourselves.
LOLs
But really, I thought this post, indeed the whole thread on the Sam Harris Forum is interesting:
EN - 24 October 2017 08:18 AM
1. “I do not hold that God is “supernatural”. It is my understanding that God is “nature”, to nature’s fullest extent.”
GAD - 24 October 2017 09:23 AM
Right out of the gate this is completely meaningless.
bbearren - 24 October 2017 01:07 PM
Why would it not be?
GAD-Posted: 24 October 2017 20:06
Indeed, why would it not be meaningless. It’s the dreamer dreaming of dreamers who dream of the dreamer dreaming of them dreaming of himself. It’s an infinite circular loop where the dreamers and the dreams are one and the same i.e. nature is the dream and the dream is nature and god is nature and nature is god which makes everything god and god everything which makes us god dreaming we are god dreaming of ourselves.
LOLs