oldfella1962
Senior Member
Here's what I totally understand about the four gospels being slightly different on details. Each writer might have noticed things the other writers didn't. That's why the police interview as many witnesses as possible to the same incident - in real time nobody can catch it all, and no memory is perfect. The more data the better up to a point. Between the four gospel authors the true, accurate story is in there somewhere.
But I just can't fathom one author witnessing a veritable zombie army but nobody else even mentions it. If there were four differing accounts of the zombie army it would (as weird as this sounds) be more credible. But when only one writer mentions it almost as an aside....I think the editor dropped the ball.
But hey, in for a penny, in for a pound. If under the right circumstances god causes one person to rise from the dead, why not other people too? Who are we to set limitations on his power?
But I just can't fathom one author witnessing a veritable zombie army but nobody else even mentions it. If there were four differing accounts of the zombie army it would (as weird as this sounds) be more credible. But when only one writer mentions it almost as an aside....I think the editor dropped the ball.
But hey, in for a penny, in for a pound. If under the right circumstances god causes one person to rise from the dead, why not other people too? Who are we to set limitations on his power?