Go Back   Georgia Outdoor News Forum > Woody's Campfire Talk > Political Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 05-15-2018, 06:57 PM
elfiii's Avatar
elfiii elfiii is offline
Admin
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The country formerly known as America
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atlashunter View Post
If that's your view then why bother with any political preference at all? Entropy will win out regardless so let's just not concern ourselves with it.
Entropy always wins out because all things tend towards entropy ultimately.

There is nothing wrong with the Constitution that could be fixed otherwise. Do you think you'll get 2/3 of both houses and 3/4 of the states to get rid of the general welfare clause? Ain't happenin' in this lifetime bra.

The Constn is specific. It gives the federal government authority to do only 18 things and through the 9 & 10 A's it makes it crystal clear that's the end of the line and the rest of the power and authority is reserved to the states or the people.

Even if you could get a ConCon and everybody would sing Kumbaya and come up with the perfect governing document that absolutely restricted the federal government no matter what how long do you think it would last? The Supremes would come up with another Marbury v Madison or there would be another Whiskey Rebellion and we'd be off to the races just like now.

In order to stop the downhill race to tyranny it's up to the people and only the people to preserve their liberty with the knowledge the people in government are there because on balance they seek dominion over the rest of us, the governing document be hanged. The people of 1800 were far less trustful of their government than we are today and the government of 1800 deserved considerably more trust than our government of today. We should be poised for violent overthrow of it if it will not bend to our will, but we don't even know what our collective will is. State nullification seems to be the order of the day and that's going to work until it doesn't work anymore.

But I didn't say stop advocating and pushing for true federalism with a federal government's intrusion into our lives much reduced. If I could see that before I die I'd die a happy man.
__________________
The World is fine. The circus just won't leave town. - PopPop
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-15-2018, 07:22 PM
atlashunter's Avatar
atlashunter atlashunter is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harris county
iTrader: (3) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elfiii View Post
Entropy always wins out because all things tend towards entropy ultimately.

There is nothing wrong with the Constitution that could be fixed otherwise. Do you think you'll get 2/3 of both houses and 3/4 of the states to get rid of the general welfare clause? Ain't happenin' in this lifetime bra.

The Constn is specific. It gives the federal government authority to do only 18 things and through the 9 & 10 A's it makes it crystal clear that's the end of the line and the rest of the power and authority is reserved to the states or the people.

Even if you could get a ConCon and everybody would sing Kumbaya and come up with the perfect governing document that absolutely restricted the federal government no matter what how long do you think it would last? The Supremes would come up with another Marbury v Madison or there would be another Whiskey Rebellion and we'd be off to the races just like now.

In order to stop the downhill race to tyranny it's up to the people and only the people to preserve their liberty with the knowledge the people in government are there because on balance they seek dominion over the rest of us, the governing document be hanged. The people of 1800 were far less trustful of their government than we are today and the government of 1800 deserved considerably more trust than our government of today. We should be poised for violent overthrow of it if it will not bend to our will, but we don't even know what our collective will is. State nullification seems to be the order of the day and that's going to work until it doesn't work anymore.

But I didn't say stop advocating and pushing for true federalism with a federal government's intrusion into our lives much reduced. If I could see that before I die I'd die a happy man.
Which one do I circle for "none of the above"? As governments go I'd give the US const a B+. That's because the antifederalists got the BoR added and because I'm feeling generous today. There are better alternatives and worse alternatives.

Since we are talking about exercising our right to alter or abolish our government let me just start out by saying I'm not interested in anything that involves being subjected to democratic governance with Californians and Yankees. That's a non-starter. That pretty much rules out any turning back the clock on the current constitution and rules out a convention to draft a new one. It rules out expecting the current government to play nice and do the right thing.

I'm not interested in federalism and have serious doubts about a loose confederation of sovereign states.

My preference would be disunion and decentralization. I want no part of sharing a government with the people of California or New York. I'm all for them getting their own way in their territory. Just don't subject me to it. State nullification is a good start. It's a step in the right direction. And no need to stop at the state level. Maybe if the central government eventually collapses of its own weight and becomes more and more ignored a process for peaceful secession could be put in place. At the state level at a minimum. If counties can acquire independence even better. Crazy perhaps but the current system is untenable and becoming more so as time goes on.
__________________
"The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits." ~Plutarch
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-15-2018, 07:52 PM
JustUs4All's Avatar
JustUs4All JustUs4All is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McDuffie
iTrader: (15) Check/Add Feedback
Default

I would like a smaller government but have some concerns with that also.

When the Country fractures, who will control the military that has policed the World for the past half century?

What force will prevent China from swallowing the pieces?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-16-2018, 02:22 PM
elfiii's Avatar
elfiii elfiii is offline
Admin
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The country formerly known as America
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustUs4All View Post
I would like a smaller government but have some concerns with that also.

When the Country fractures, who will control the military that has policed the World for the past half century?

What force will prevent China from swallowing the pieces?
Anarchists have no time to devote to such minor details.
__________________
The World is fine. The circus just won't leave town. - PopPop
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-16-2018, 02:25 PM
JustUs4All's Avatar
JustUs4All JustUs4All is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McDuffie
iTrader: (15) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Probably what keeps me out of that camp.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05-16-2018, 03:02 PM
VTRman's Avatar
VTRman VTRman is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Decatur
iTrader: (3) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Yeah, 'cause we sold 'em the rope with which they will hang us.

Smell the fear.
What a compelling argument to continue to put up with an overarching, criminal, tyrannical, out of control government.
__________________
Republicans are dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-16-2018, 03:34 PM
elfiii's Avatar
elfiii elfiii is offline
Admin
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The country formerly known as America
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atlashunter View Post
Which one do I circle for "none of the above"? As governments go I'd give the US const a B+. That's because the antifederalists got the BoR added and because I'm feeling generous today. There are better alternatives and worse alternatives.


I'm not interested in federalism and have serious doubts about a loose confederation of sovereign states.
Well, federalism is what you got and the overwhelming majority of the people in this country are mostly comfortable with it.
__________________
The World is fine. The circus just won't leave town. - PopPop
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-16-2018, 04:14 PM
PopPop's Avatar
PopPop PopPop is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PopPops Gulch
iTrader: (8) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atlashunter View Post
Which one do I circle for "none of the above"? As governments go I'd give the US const a B+. That's because the antifederalists got the BoR added and because I'm feeling generous today. There are better alternatives and worse alternatives.

Since we are talking about exercising our right to alter or abolish our government let me just start out by saying I'm not interested in anything that involves being subjected to democratic governance with Californians and Yankees. That's a non-starter. That pretty much rules out any turning back the clock on the current constitution and rules out a convention to draft a new one. It rules out expecting the current government to play nice and do the right thing.

I'm not interested in federalism and have serious doubts about a loose confederation of sovereign states.

My preference would be disunion and decentralization. I want no part of sharing a government with the people of California or New York. I'm all for them getting their own way in their territory. Just don't subject me to it. State nullification is a good start. It's a step in the right direction. And no need to stop at the state level. Maybe if the central government eventually collapses of its own weight and becomes more and more ignored a process for peaceful secession could be put in place. At the state level at a minimum. If counties can acquire independence even better. Crazy perhaps but the current system is untenable and becoming more so as time goes on.
You are applying geographical boundaries to philosophical differences, that doesn't solve our problem.
About half the population, nation wide are socialist or Communist. They tend to be concentrated in urban areas. Atlanta is almost as bad as California.
__________________
I don't boil meat no more!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-16-2018, 04:18 PM
elfiii's Avatar
elfiii elfiii is offline
Admin
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The country formerly known as America
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PopPop View Post
You are applying geographical boundaries to philosophical differences, that doesn't solve our problem.
About half the population, nation wide are socialist or Communist. They tend to be concentrated in urban areas. Atlanta is almost as bad as California.
He's probably thinking Idaho, Montana or Alaska.
__________________
The World is fine. The circus just won't leave town. - PopPop
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 Georgia Outdoor News, Inc.Ad Management by RedTyger