A question for believers

ambush80 said:

What would you be trying to express by highlighting those words?

Click to expand...

ambush80 said:

That's kind of what I was assuming. I was assuming that ALL the switches in the brain had been mapped out. But maybe that's the plot wrinkle in the story.....

Click to expand...

hummerpoo said:

It's not my genre either, but the potential sequels are endless.

Click to expand...

Israel said:

But the words came through man in both cases...the hoof beats.

And there's reason in each word.

Click to expand...

ambush80 said:

As far as I can tell, the only thing that gets one saved is believing that Jesus is Lord. One of these days we will be able to make people truly believe that by throwing a "switch".

Click to expand...

WaltL1 said:

Weren't you listening to Welder?
Just believing does not = YAHTZEE!!
Just believing without the magic ticket gets you a spot near the burn barrel with us.

Click to expand...

WaltL1 said:

And the evidence either will or will not bear out if one or both of the men infused "themselves" into it.
Our discussion is diametrically opposed here Israel.
I am removing man and all that is "him" from the equation and your point is based entirely on putting him into the equation so that its "him" that is now the controlling factor instead of the evidence.
Which is why you have to remove him from the equation...

Click to expand...

bullethead said:

I know, yet I dont know.
It matters but it doesnt matter.
I don't remember but here is what I remember.
You could be wrong but you may be right.
Wrong inferences easily lead to wrong conclusions, let me tell you about my inferred conclusion.
These matters, or none of these matters.
I Didn't believe now Im all in kit and kaboodle.

I guess when the bible is the example one chooses to live by, contradictions cannot be avoided.

Click to expand...

WaltL1 said:

And the evidence either will or will not bear out if one or both of the men infused "themselves" into it.
Our discussion is diametrically opposed here Israel.
I am removing man and all that is "him" from the equation and your point is based entirely on putting him into the equation so that its "him" that is now the controlling factor instead of the evidence.
Which is why you have to remove him from the equation...

Click to expand...