cowhornedspike
Senior Member
Pretty much. I believe bars are opt-in also along with churches and the list is larger than just court houses...post office, jails, etc.
Welcome Guest!
Open carry at Wal-mart
- Thread starter fireman32
- Start date
Pretty much. I believe bars are opt-in also along with churches and the list is larger than just court houses...post office, jails, etc.
The Longhunter
Banned
Bars are opt out.
NOYDB
BANNED
Just don't show off or brag. Don't matter if you room with the Brady's.
I realize asking people today to keep their mouths shut is a major imposition. Go ahead pretend you matured beyond High School. Shock the bejeebers out of the rest of the world.
Good luck!
I realize asking people today to keep their mouths shut is a major imposition. Go ahead pretend you matured beyond High School. Shock the bejeebers out of the rest of the world.
Good luck!
gunsaler111
Banned
The second amendment is well on its way out,and this thread is proof.....
SkintRider
Senior Member
tv_racin_fan
Senior Member
He might, then again he might see you and decide to go elsewhere or wait till you leave. THAT is exactly what happened a year or two ago in a Waffle House. Bad guys decided to scout the place out, spotted a couple good ole boys armed with 1911s and decided to wait em out, observant officer spotted em sittin in the car parked out back and decided to check em out.
Only been a couple times I can think of where an open carry guy got ganked first. One of them was known to carry in the area and was specifically targetted it because he carried, don't think it would have matted open or concealed carry since he let it be known. The other guy simply was not aware of his surroundings. I try to make eye contact with almost everyone I come across. Want them to know I know they are there.
Dub
Senior Member
Agreed.
Dub
Senior Member
I really hope they make this very clear with the criminals who are packing heat.
No longer can a woman cc in Target, so she can be even more exposed to harm when she's returning to her car. Great policy, Target.
I've spent my last dollar with them.
cowhornedspike
Senior Member
She can CC all she wants in Target as their "policy" carries no legal weight in GA unless they know she is packing and ask her to leave...which they should never know if she keeps it concealed.
Anyone who goes there and doesn't CC simply because Target says they shouldn't only has themselves to blame if they can't protect themselves when an incident happens.
I don't argue with not spending my money there though due to their attitude toward CC.
steeleagle
Banned
The second amendment is well on its way out,and this thread is proof.....
Can you please provide examples?
fireman32
"Useless Billy" Fire Chief.
I think he's implying by the debate of this topic, that since the laws aren't completely understood by everyone, we are losing ground. I don't think he's entirely accurate, but we should be up to date on current laws.
Wouldn't hurt to be more involved in the political process either.
Slingblade
Gone But Not Forgotten
mikey1297 said:
Posted from Gon.com App for Android
One caveat to that however, I am not a lawyer or expert, but I think it is possible to have a contract with clauses that can be thrown out in court due to violating other statutes. For example, I think if the landlord tried to dictate the tenant is responsible for routine maintenance, it would get tossed if it ever went to court, even if the tenant signed it.
Don't know, but would be interested to know about the enforceability of a "gun ban" clause for rental tenants.
Restricting weapons possession does not violate any other statutes. There is no statute that states that a person may posses a weapon on the property of another after receiving notice not to. Including certain routine maintenance in rental contracts is a standard practice.
StriperrHunterr
Senior Member
I've seen judges uphold even irrational agreements made between two parties simply because the contract did exist. Not saying it's the norm, just that it's happened, even in the case of one person getting raked over the coals.
The Longhunter
Banned
Parties can generally contract for anything that is not illegal or immoral (and I'm not sure about that anymore).
Leases, especially commercial ones, routinely have clauses making the tenant responsible for routine maintenance. A common one is making the tenant responsible for damages caused by clogged toilets, or damage from turning off the heat and letting the pipes freeze. Also, clauses requiring the tenant to keep up the grounds are common.
So yes, a tenant could agree not to have any guns as part of a lease, and a breach would be grounds for dispossession. The remedy for any of the above is not to sign leases (or contracts) that contain such clauses.
I guess I gave a poor example. I was thinking more along the lines of a landlord requiring the tenant to replace the appliances or AC unit failing due to normal usage. Or trying to grant the police permission to conduct searches at any time without a warrant or something like that.
steeleagle
Banned
This whole thread has really shocked me to the number of people that truly don't believe in private property rights.
