GON Magazine | GON Classifieds

Go Back   Georgia Outdoor News Forum > Woody's Campfire Talk > Political Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2008, 03:59 PM
BOW'D UP's Avatar
BOW'D UP BOW'D UP is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fla
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default Wher'd All The Paullocks Go

seriously, whered they all go??????
is the revolution finally over.??

I GUESS THEY FINALLY HEARD HIM TALK ABOUT DEFENDING THE NATION!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-22-2008, 04:17 PM
Fletchling Fletchling is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Opelika, AL
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

I can't speak for my other constitutionaly minded brethren, however, I've been posting discussing the proper role of a fiat currency in a stable economy.
Oh, and the revolution won't be over for me until they come and pry my liberty from my cold dead hands.
__________________
"tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito"
"Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more bodly against it."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-22-2008, 07:04 PM
RedFoxx RedFoxx is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N/A
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

All right BOW'd UP, you want to talk about defending the US. Let's talk about defending the US.

Who is the only Congressman to offer a resolution to officially declare war on Iraq? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce a bill to deny student visas to students from "terrorist" nations? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce legislation to allow airlines to arm their pilots, which, by the way, would have prevented 911? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman who has introduced legislation to end the practice of birth-right citizenship? That would be Ron Paul.

You Socialist, big government neo-cons that have hijacked the Republican party attempt to paint anyone who disagrees with your Bill Clinton-style, nation building and policing of the world foreign policy as un-American and unwilling to defend the country. It's not going to work with me.

I'm sorry that you're upset that there are at least a few of us left in the Republican party that believe in limited government and believe in a strict adherence to the United States Constitution.

How, sir, is the United States any safer by our meddling in Middle Eastern affairs? Is it that two billion dollars that we borrow each day from the Communist Chinese in order to build trillion dollar embassies (with 30 foot walls) in the middle of Baghdad that makes us safer? Is it the fact that our trillion dollar per year foreign policy causes us to be faced with massive debt and rampant inflation that makes us safer? Is it the fact that Al-Queda is now stronger than ever that makes us safer?

Is it the weakening of the US dollar due to our overextension overseas that makes us safer?

Or perhaps it's our surrendering of our sovereignty to the United Nations that makes us safer. Let's don't forget that enforcing UN resolutions was one of the main reasons for invading Iraq. I'm sorry that some of us in the Republican party still believe that the US should, and by right ought to be, A FREE AND INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN NATION.

Is it the fact that our borders are wide open? How can you be so scared of a bearded, middle eastern man attacking you, yet you're ok with us securing the border of Iraq, while our very own borders remain wide open.

If you neocons really believed in what you argue (that the Muslims are coming!!), then why are our borders wide open? Why?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-22-2008, 07:26 PM
cardfan cardfan is offline
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Powder Springs GA
iTrader: (3) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Hey Red....YOU ROCK!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-22-2008, 07:35 PM
HOGDOG76's Avatar
HOGDOG76 HOGDOG76 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SYLVESTER
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFoxx View Post
All right BOW'd UP, you want to talk about defending the US. Let's talk about defending the US.

Who is the only Congressman to offer a resolution to officially declare war on Iraq? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce a bill to deny student visas to students from "terrorist" nations? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce legislation to allow airlines to arm their pilots, which, by the way, would have prevented 911? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman who has introduced legislation to end the practice of birth-right citizenship? That would be Ron Paul.

You Socialist, big government neo-cons that have hijacked the Republican party attempt to paint anyone who disagrees with your Bill Clinton-style, nation building and policing of the world foreign policy as un-American and unwilling to defend the country. It's not going to work with me.

I'm sorry that you're upset that there are at least a few of us left in the Republican party that believe in limited government and believe in a strict adherence to the United States Constitution.

How, sir, is the United States any safer by our meddling in Middle Eastern affairs? Is it that two billion dollars that we borrow each day from the Communist Chinese in order to build trillion dollar embassies (with 30 foot walls) in the middle of Baghdad that makes us safer? Is it the fact that our trillion dollar per year foreign policy causes us to be faced with massive debt and rampant inflation that makes us safer? Is it the fact that Al-Queda is now stronger than ever that makes us safer?

Is it the weakening of the US dollar due to our overextension overseas that makes us safer?

Or perhaps it's our surrendering of our sovereignty to the United Nations that makes us safer. Let's don't forget that enforcing UN resolutions was one of the main reasons for invading Iraq. I'm sorry that some of us in the Republican party still believe that the US should, and by right ought to be, A FREE AND INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN NATION.

Is it the fact that our borders are wide open? How can you be so scared of a bearded, middle eastern man attacking you, yet you're ok with us securing the border of Iraq, while our very own borders remain wide open.

If you neocons really believed in what you argue (that the Muslims are coming!!), then why are our borders wide open? Why?
AND I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE. THANK YOU RED.
__________________
If you can't eat horns why do meathunters shoot bucks?!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:44 PM
greene_dawg's Avatar
greene_dawg greene_dawg is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wetumpka, Al
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Been here the whole time. The problem is that whenever someone actually brought up facts you avoided the posts... How's your boy Thompson doing? Not as good as Paul I see...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:56 PM
formula1's Avatar
formula1 formula1 is offline
Daily Bible Verse Organizer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default RE:

I laughed when I saw 'Paullocks'. That was funny I don't care who you are!

B4 you Paullocks go jumping on me, let me say I like him! If it were not for his stance on the war, I could see myself supporting him! It's as simple as that! I just simply do not agree and it is a show stopper for me! Sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:58 PM
hicktownboy's Avatar
hicktownboy hicktownboy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ball Ground
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formula1 View Post
I laughed when I saw 'Paullocks'. That was funny I don't care who you are!

B4 you Paullocks go jumping on me, let me say I like him! If it were not for his stance on the war, I could see myself supporting him! It's as simple as that! I just simply do not agree and it is a show stopper for me! Sorry!
same here...
__________________
I hear voices like, my dad sayin work that job, but dont work your life away
Mama tellin me to drop some cash in the offering plate on Sunday!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:00 PM
greene_dawg's Avatar
greene_dawg greene_dawg is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wetumpka, Al
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

His point is that Iraq is/was a mistake. Don't confuse that with his willingness to defend America... There are lots of folks who think that our resources would've been better used elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:06 PM
Bigtimber's Avatar
Bigtimber Bigtimber is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Everyone has to research into who they like the most and who they think is best for the job at hand...Ron Paul has my vote.
__________________
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism."... Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:14 PM
MR. SCOOTINN MR. SCOOTINN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BONAIRE GA
iTrader: (9) Check/Add Feedback
Default

i am still with him...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:28 PM
formula1's Avatar
formula1 formula1 is offline
Daily Bible Verse Organizer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greene_dawg View Post
His point is that Iraq is/was a mistake. Don't confuse that with his willingness to defend America... There are lots of folks who think that our resources would've been better used elsewhere.
I know his point well! I do not agree and never have and quite frankly, never will. I think his position makes this nation look weak, something that we cannot afford right now!

But I do absolutely respect your right to think differently if you so choose!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:32 PM
Huntin' Dawg's Avatar
Huntin' Dawg Huntin' Dawg is offline
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stone Mountain
iTrader: (10) Check/Add Feedback
Default

How do you drive a Paullock crazy?




Put him in a round room, and tell him to vote in the corner.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:34 PM
RedFoxx RedFoxx is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N/A
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2...-explains.html

Watch the entire video.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-22-2008, 09:47 PM
formula1's Avatar
formula1 formula1 is offline
Daily Bible Verse Organizer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default RE:

I watched it! No change in my point of view! I will say nothing else on the matter! Sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-22-2008, 10:07 PM
greene_dawg's Avatar
greene_dawg greene_dawg is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wetumpka, Al
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formula1 View Post
I know his point well! I do not agree and never have and quite frankly, never will. I think his position makes this nation look weak, something that we cannot afford right now!

But I do absolutely respect your right to think differently if you so choose!

Good point and I understand. But I don't think that admitting that you might've made a mistake in invading Iraq instead of plowing Afganistan under and maybe following through in Pakistan as being a weak stance.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-23-2008, 07:29 AM
formula1's Avatar
formula1 formula1 is offline
Daily Bible Verse Organizer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default RE:

I don't believe it was a mistake as do many folks who would otherwise support him. This is what makes his stance weak from my point of view and I don't believe I could trust him to aggressively defend this country as a result.

Defending our country from Islamic radicals, which Iraq is a part of that in my view, is the #1 issue for most Americans. If RP had a different position on Iraq, it might have truely been a revolution.

I'll give him credit for not being a flip-flopper and remaining true to his position though.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-23-2008, 07:52 AM
MR. SCOOTINN MR. SCOOTINN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BONAIRE GA
iTrader: (9) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formula1 View Post
I don't believe it was a mistake as do many folks who would otherwise support him. This is what makes his stance weak from my point of view and I don't believe I could trust him to aggressively defend this country as a result.

Defending our country from Islamic radicals, which Iraq is a part of that in my view, is the #1 issue for most Americans. If RP had a different position on Iraq, it might have truely been a revolution.

I'll give him credit for not being a flip-flopper and remaining true to his position though.

this is my problem...the iraq war.was bassed on 911...if we are at war with them for being part of the islamic radicals...why are we borrowing money from china ..to give to pakisatan....who are safe keeping the radicals,,& have nuclear capabilitys...
...when we are done in iraq ,if we ever are..they may not even be an allie of ours,,,,all we have to do is look at osama & sadam to see that.....

i say if we are at war with islamic radicals...lets start in pakistian ,,,stop giveing them money ,,training thier troops...lets blow the stuffing out of them...but why pay them...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-23-2008, 07:55 AM
skinner's Avatar
skinner skinner is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Marietta
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Good response Red. GO Ron Paul!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-23-2008, 09:10 AM
pbradley's Avatar
pbradley pbradley is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Amerika
iTrader: (7) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOW'D UP View Post
seriously, whered they all go??????
is the revolution finally over.??

I GUESS THEY FINALLY HEARD HIM TALK ABOUT DEFENDING THE NATION!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletchling View Post
I can't speak for my other constitutionaly minded brethren, however, I've been posting discussing the proper role of a fiat currency in a stable economy.
Oh, and the revolution won't be over for me until they come and pry my liberty from my cold dead hands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFoxx View Post
All right BOW'd UP, you want to talk about defending the US. Let's talk about defending the US.

Who is the only Congressman to offer a resolution to officially declare war on Iraq? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce a bill to deny student visas to students from "terrorist" nations? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce legislation to allow airlines to arm their pilots, which, by the way, would have prevented 911? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman who has introduced legislation to end the practice of birth-right citizenship? That would be Ron Paul.

You Socialist, big government neo-cons that have hijacked the Republican party attempt to paint anyone who disagrees with your Bill Clinton-style, nation building and policing of the world foreign policy as un-American and unwilling to defend the country. It's not going to work with me.

I'm sorry that you're upset that there are at least a few of us left in the Republican party that believe in limited government and believe in a strict adherence to the United States Constitution.

How, sir, is the United States any safer by our meddling in Middle Eastern affairs? Is it that two billion dollars that we borrow each day from the Communist Chinese in order to build trillion dollar embassies (with 30 foot walls) in the middle of Baghdad that makes us safer? Is it the fact that our trillion dollar per year foreign policy causes us to be faced with massive debt and rampant inflation that makes us safer? Is it the fact that Al-Queda is now stronger than ever that makes us safer?

Is it the weakening of the US dollar due to our overextension overseas that makes us safer?

Or perhaps it's our surrendering of our sovereignty to the United Nations that makes us safer. Let's don't forget that enforcing UN resolutions was one of the main reasons for invading Iraq. I'm sorry that some of us in the Republican party still believe that the US should, and by right ought to be, A FREE AND INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN NATION.

Is it the fact that our borders are wide open? How can you be so scared of a bearded, middle eastern man attacking you, yet you're ok with us securing the border of Iraq, while our very own borders remain wide open.

If you neocons really believed in what you argue (that the Muslims are coming!!), then why are our borders wide open? Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardfan View Post
Hey Red....YOU ROCK!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOGDOG76 View Post
AND I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE. THANK YOU RED.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greene_dawg View Post
Been here the whole time. The problem is that whenever someone actually brought up facts you avoided the posts... How's your boy Thompson doing? Not as good as Paul I see...
Quote:
Originally Posted by greene_dawg View Post
His point is that Iraq is/was a mistake. Don't confuse that with his willingness to defend America... There are lots of folks who think that our resources would've been better used elsewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtimber View Post
Everyone has to research into who they like the most and who they think is best for the job at hand...Ron Paul has my vote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MR. SCOOTINN View Post
i am still with him...
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinner View Post
Good response Red. GO Ron Paul!
Well, apparently, we're all still here. RedFoxx, you rock, buddy.

The "revolution" didn't start with this campaign cycle and it won't end after this cycle is over.

There are still Americans left in this country who believe in a small, Constitutionally-restrained government.

I've been on a job-site in Baltimore lately, working on the first job with my new company, so I've been too busy to post. I have checked in occasionally and I've been doing some reading this morning, too.

I have to say that it's a truly wonderful feeling to be voting on pure principle; the other RP supporters, like myself, must also be having a good time watching some of the posts on this forum recently. No calculating triangulating for us.

My particular favorites are of the wailing and gnashing of teeth variety: "My candidate dropped out! Oh, woe is me! Let's see which horrible, awful candidate is left now...let me see, which one is less horrible and less awful than all the rest?"

"Who can I vote for that won't make me throw up in the voting booth? A gun-grabbing New York liberal, a lying Massachusetts liberal, an anti-1st Amendment Arizona democrat masquerading as a Republican, and a populist preacher from Hope..."

And you think Ron Paul supporters are crazy?
__________________
Gone fishin'.
Rules are for other people.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-23-2008, 09:28 AM
Bigtimber's Avatar
Bigtimber Bigtimber is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formula1 View Post

Defending our country from Islamic radicals, which Iraq is a part of that in my view, is the #1 issue for most Americans.

Defending the nation from Isamlic radicals?....You think that is the sole/number #1 top purpose for being in Iraq? I don't myself....otherwise we we be in other countries with FAR greater terrorist populations than Iraq....this thread here http://forum.gon.com/showthread.php?...highlight=iran .....(post #46 )that about sums up a big reason were there...and radical isalm in not top priority....to insure free trade of oil in the region is not what out military is for....at least not in my book.

Ron Paul is a strict constitutionalist...carries a copy on him at all times. Declaring war is what the constitution outlines...Ron Paul has said many time....declare war...outline what needs to be done written up in a declation of war and I'll fight the war and win. Him personally agreeing with the declaration is not his job as he sees it as President.....winning a declared war is. Again he is a constitutionalist. Something we drift away from all the time...and declaring war is no exception to this.

He said it about Iraq....if congress had declared war with Iraq and had a goal outlined in the war declaration....He, as commander of military (president) would go in there and win period. As a congressmen he voted against the action....(again whats the top priority in your mind?) He voted for action in Afganistan. Congressmen and President have different roles as outlined...again...in the constituition.
__________________
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism."... Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-23-2008, 09:46 AM
formula1's Avatar
formula1 formula1 is offline
Daily Bible Verse Organizer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
iTrader: (5) Check/Add Feedback
Default RE:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtimber View Post
Defending the nation from Isamlic radicals?....You think that is the sole/number #1 top purpose for being in Iraq?.
There's way more to it than that, but it is part of it, whether you choose to accept it or not! I have already said all I need to in this post. My posts here have to do with why I don't support RP, nothing else. Go read them.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-23-2008, 10:03 AM
Bigtimber's Avatar
Bigtimber Bigtimber is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formula1 View Post
There's way more to it than that, but it is part of it, whether you choose to accept it or not! I have already said all I need to in this post. My posts here have to do with why I don't support RP, nothing else. Go read them.
I never said that wasn't part of it.....just asked how big of a part. Certainly not top priority as I see it....you don't seem too sure either.
__________________
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism."... Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-23-2008, 10:37 AM
elfiii's Avatar
elfiii elfiii is offline
Admin
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The country formerly known as America
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR. SCOOTINN View Post
this is my problem...the iraq war.was bassed on 911....
Actually it wasn't, but reasonable people can disagree.
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. - H. L. Mencken
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-23-2008, 11:14 AM
BOW'D UP's Avatar
BOW'D UP BOW'D UP is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fla
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFoxx View Post
All right BOW'd UP, you want to talk about defending the US. Let's talk about defending the US.

Who is the only Congressman to offer a resolution to officially declare war on Iraq? That would be Ron Paul.

Who is the only Congressman to introduce a bill to deny student visas to students from "terrorist" nations? That would be Ron Paul.

You Socialist, big government neo-cons that have hijacked the Republican party attempt to paint anyone who disagrees with your Bill Clinton-style, nation building and policing of the world foreign policy as un-American and unwilling to defend the country. It's not going to work with me.

How, sir, is the United States any safer by our meddling in Middle Eastern affairs? Is it the fact that Al-Queda is now stronger than ever that makes us safer?

Is it the fact that our borders are wide open? How can you be so scared of a bearded, middle eastern man attacking you, yet you're ok with us securing the border of Iraq, while our very own borders remain wide open.

If you neocons really believed in what you argue (that the Muslims are coming!!), then why are our borders wide open? Why?


they might think you rock--- butt they too have been fooled by a wackoo-----not a conservative republican---

who is the congressman who wanted to cry about DECLARATION OF WAR--- just as a way of being a whiny , little dont defend us liberal.thats what he is hiding behind-- declaration of war---- name the last war we declared----- did we declare war on HITLER------no---THATS JUST A WEAK ARGUEMENT TO MAKE YOURSELF FEEL BETTER about being anti war---period.... i would rather someone be in control to make a decision rather than trying to get WORDING thru the congress- WHICH AS WE KNOW WOULD GET NOWHERE--- SIMPLE--- IF WE TRIED THAT DECLARATION CRAP--- NOONE WOULD EVER BE DEALT WITH.
Im sure any of the other candidates would be good with banning students visas also if you push them on it------ another good sounding -sound bite- and a good idea-- but the foundation of the presidency--NOWAY!

so now PAUL is running ads here in fla that are out and out lies.
how will he go after bin laden and terrroists with as he says"STEALTH WARRIORS"---WHERE will these stealth warriors come from after Paul eliminates ALL foriegn bases.imagine gettin dropped in after 36 hour flight and having to notify 6 different countries that you are coming(fly over).--just like when CLINTON sent over a cruise missle to deal with bin laden-- then as soon as its launched--- madeline albright calls Pakistan and tells them .
next Paul will hire "TERMINATORS " TO HUNT THEM DOWN------- he claims to get our soldiers all the equipment they need---- need to do what recover after the attacks.cause it sure wont be equipment to take the fight to our enemy.
you really want us to totally pull out of middle east and have no idea what they are up too. do you really think these countries will help us/allow us to launch from their country after we pull out on them/-- Paul would reverse 50 yrs of foriegn policy , would start us over with no allies--breaking every deal ever made. only to be voted out after 4 yrs and someone else would have to deal with his mess.

now MR REDD--- why do you think i want an open border---- the other candidates will also protect it as much as Paul, just cause i like freedom and defending our country and not allowing a lack of common sense by some cause harm to my country

Paul quote-- after bein asked on Bill MOYERS how would he defend us if attacked--" i dont believe we will be attacked--- we have the most powerful military on earth--- why on earth would they attacks us""

after Iran ran their speed boats at our ships---=paul said this golden nugget that reflects the same exact thinking

Paul"i think the captain should have shown more restraint, i mean they were in speed boats against a warship, why would they attack a Big ship"

UNBELIEVABLE-------
\RED WHY CANT YOU SEE THAT HES DANGEROUS
AND TRYING TO PAINT CONSERVATIVES THAT DONT LIKE PAUL AS FOR BIG GOV AND OPEN BORDERS IS JUST MORE PAUL SMOKE AND MIRRORS---- TERRORISTS JUST GONNA LOVE US NOW REDD??


again i challange anyone to SHOW ME PAULS PLAN TO FIGHT ISLAMIC FACISTS WHO HAVE DECLARED WAR ON US--------THATS ---HAVE DECLARED WAR ON US!!!

Last edited by BOW'D UP; 01-23-2008 at 11:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 Georgia Outdoor News, Inc.Ad Management by RedTyger