GON Magazine | GON Marketplace

Go Back   Georgia Outdoor News Forum > Firearms > Firearms, Reloading and Scopes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2009, 05:31 PM
HotDog's Avatar
HotDog HotDog is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maryland
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default Anyone use the 260 Rem to hunt deer?

I bought my brothers Remington Model 7 in 260 Rem. Anyone hunt deer with this caliber? I've got a buddy that had a TC Encore in 260 but he didn't like it. He was shooting 140gr Rem factory loads and had some deer get away. Now I understand that with any caliber ya got hit em in the goodies but this guy doesn't usually let deer get away. I'm thinking a hand load with a lighter bullet, maybe 120gr might be the ticket.
Any thought or ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2009, 06:21 PM
mrfudd mrfudd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Augusta
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Nothing wrong with the .260. The Swedes use the very similar 6.5x55 to kill Moose, so the issue is not with the round. 140 or 120 grain coreloks will kill any deer-if you hit it properly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2009, 08:25 PM
redjoe redjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default 260

I have a 260 and love it. In fact I'm looking to put together an encore with 260 bbl. I prefer the 120 Remington and had very good results with grouping. If you look at remingto site and compare the 120 gr in 260 and 7mm-08 you'll find their almost identical. Both rounds are based on the .308 case.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2009, 09:53 PM
jglenn's Avatar
jglenn jglenn is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Monroe Ga
iTrader: (23) Check/Add Feedback
Default

260 with accubonds will flat do the job

my mdl 7 refuses to shoot any load over 1" most are around .5 and I like the 130 and 140 gr.

Last edited by jglenn; 08-06-2009 at 07:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2009, 09:55 PM
Buzz's Avatar
Buzz Buzz is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not far enough NW of Atlanta
iTrader: (13) Check/Add Feedback
Default

I use it's ballistic twin the 6.5x55. I handload and run the Remington Corelocks to about 2750 fps and also I've used the 140g Nosler Partition. Thus far I've not had a bullet fail to exit; however, I'm going to try the 130g Nosler Accubonds this year.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2009, 10:14 PM
ATLRoach's Avatar
ATLRoach ATLRoach is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Marietta/Kennesaw
iTrader: (32) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Not a 260 but I use a 260AI. One of the best 308 cased rounds. I shoot 140 Hunting Bergers moving about 2850

Side Note: If you handload use 7mm-08 Win Brass necked down or Lapua Necked up 243 brass. Remington brass is too soft and will loose the primer pockets after 3 fires if you are getting near max loads.
__________________
Kyle
GCO Member

Last edited by ATLRoach; 08-05-2009 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:07 PM
georgiaboy's Avatar
georgiaboy georgiaboy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dahlonega
iTrader: (49) Check/Add Feedback
Default

I shot 140 Bergers in a 6.5-284 (which is just a faster .260). I have also used 140 GameKings with success.
__________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces: in this sign you will conquer
Long live crabbybill.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2009, 11:14 PM
grouper sandwich's Avatar
grouper sandwich grouper sandwich is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

If your buddy was losing deer with a 260, he needed to be spending more time at the range and less in the woods. ANY shot from that round in the vitals will result in a very, very dead deer, quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-06-2009, 08:25 AM
Doyle Doyle is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradenton, Fl
iTrader: (3) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Up until recently, the only factory 120grn rounds (that were commonly available) were the Federal ballistic tips and Remington Accutips (their version of a ballistic tips). I don't like ballistic tips, so I went with the 140grn Federals. 125grn Nosler Partitions are made (I think it's Corbon that sells them), but they are very hard to find.

Lately, Federal has been making Fusions with 120grn bullets in .260. As a bonus, the Fusions are also about $10/box cheaper than other premium bullets. When my current supply of Federal 140's are used up, I'm switching to the 120 Fusions.

As a side note, this year I'll be hunting with 2 .260 firearms. I picked up a Rem model 7 with the short barrel (perfect light treestand gun) to match the Rem XP100R pistol I already had.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:30 AM
howl howl is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Putnam County, GA
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

120gr NBT drops them like flipping a switch and keeps on going. If you want to use anything over 130 grains you might as well get a 7mm08. Its faster with the heavier bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:41 AM
Jeff Phillips's Avatar
Jeff Phillips Jeff Phillips is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Silver City
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

My son has a Ruger Compact .260 that is a sweet little rifle!

I want to try the 120's in it this year.
__________________
Today is the oldest I've ever been and the youngest I'll ever be, need to make the most of it either way!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:48 AM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Griffin Ga
iTrader: (9) Check/Add Feedback
Default

No reason for the 260 since there is the 7mm-08 IMO. On a side note I know of a nice buck that was shot in the neck that fell to the ground like a sack of potatoes. As the hunter ejected the shell and was sitting there admiring his nice buck, it stood up and walked off. We never found it nor nor any sign of it.
__________________
I only envy those who catch more fish than me.-Issac Walton
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-06-2009, 11:08 AM
TreeFrog's Avatar
TreeFrog TreeFrog is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Leesburg, GA
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

No reason for the 7mm-08 since there is a .308 IMO but that said the .260 is more than enough gun for any whitetail anywhere. The gun would also be an ideal choice for pronghorn and sheep. Any .260 bullet from 120-140 grains is capable of a clean kill. I might stay with the heavier bullets if you intend to use it for black bears, elk, or similar but I recommend that you find what your gun likes best for accuracy and leave it alone.
__________________
TreeFrog
Aim small, miss small.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-06-2009, 01:13 PM
grouper sandwich's Avatar
grouper sandwich grouper sandwich is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
No reason for the 260 since there is the 7mm-08 IMO. On a side note I know of a nice buck that was shot in the neck that fell to the ground like a sack of potatoes. As the hunter ejected the shell and was sitting there admiring his nice buck, it stood up and walked off. We never found it nor nor any sign of it.
That's what happens when someone makes a marginal shot on a deer in the neck and misses the spine, jugular and windpipe. My suggestion to that hunter would be to practice better shot placement in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-06-2009, 01:31 PM
Buzz's Avatar
Buzz Buzz is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not far enough NW of Atlanta
iTrader: (13) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grouper sandwich View Post
That's what happens when someone makes a marginal shot on a deer in the neck and misses the spine, jugular and windpipe. My suggestion to that hunter would be to practice better shot placement in the future.
Yep - would have happed with the 7mm-08, .308 Win, .30-06, etc too. Classic case of poor shot placement.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-06-2009, 01:32 PM
Twenty five ought six Twenty five ought six is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At home
iTrader: (20) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeFrog View Post
No reason for the 7mm-08 since there is a .308 IMO but that said the .260 is more than enough gun for any whitetail anywhere. The gun would also be an ideal choice for pronghorn and sheep. Any .260 bullet from 120-140 grains is capable of a clean kill. I might stay with the heavier bullets if you intend to use it for black bears, elk, or similar but I recommend that you find what your gun likes best for accuracy and leave it alone.
No reason for the 7mm-08 because there is the 7mm Mauser (75 years before the .308) .

No need for the .260 because there is the 6.5 X 55 Mauser

Oh, wait --them's some of them infernal European calibers. I can't read no metric crap.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-06-2009, 03:24 PM
georgiaboy's Avatar
georgiaboy georgiaboy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dahlonega
iTrader: (49) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty five ought six View Post
No reason for the 7mm-08 because there is the 7mm Mauser (75 years before the .308) .

No need for the .260 because there is the 6.5 X 55 Mauser

Oh, wait --them's some of them infernal European calibers. I can't read no metric crap.
Be like me and go with a blend. 6.5-284 gives you an ol' obsolete caliber AND the metric system.

Shoulda named it the .260 Royale with cheese.
__________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces: in this sign you will conquer
Long live crabbybill.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-06-2009, 03:52 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Griffin Ga
iTrader: (9) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grouper sandwich View Post
That's what happens when someone makes a marginal shot on a deer in the neck and misses the spine, jugular and windpipe. My suggestion to that hunter would be to practice better shot placement in the future.
I agree........just saying. The real point is the 260 leaves little room for bad shots. Not that that is an excuse, people kill deer with 223's every year. There is just not a lot of room for error.
__________________
I only envy those who catch more fish than me.-Issac Walton
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-06-2009, 04:05 PM
Jeff Phillips's Avatar
Jeff Phillips Jeff Phillips is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Silver City
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

There is not a nickles worth of difference in the killing power, energy, drop, room for shot error, or any other factor, between the .308, 7-08, and the 260
__________________
Today is the oldest I've ever been and the youngest I'll ever be, need to make the most of it either way!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-06-2009, 04:59 PM
shortround1 shortround1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: conyers, ga.
iTrader: (0) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redjoe View Post
I have a 260 and love it. In fact I'm looking to put together an encore with 260 bbl. I prefer the 120 Remington and had very good results with grouping. If you look at remingto site and compare the 120 gr in 260 and 7mm-08 you'll find their almost identical. Both rounds are based on the .308 case.
just a little ribbing in fun, if they came from a .308 case, why not shoot a .308?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:10 PM
Twenty five ought six Twenty five ought six is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At home
iTrader: (20) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortround1 View Post
just a little ribbing in fun, if they came from a .308 case, why not shoot a .308?
The .308 came from the .30-06 which came from the 7mm Mauser, so ......
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:12 PM
Twenty five ought six Twenty five ought six is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At home
iTrader: (20) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
I agree........just saying. The real point is the 260 leaves little room for bad shots. Not that that is an excuse, people kill deer with 223's every year. There is just not a lot of room for error.
Which caliber would you suggest has a lot of room for bad shots?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:26 PM
WTM45's Avatar
WTM45 WTM45 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
iTrader: (6) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Phillips View Post
There is not a nickles worth of difference in the killing power, energy, drop, room for shot error, or any other factor, between the .308, 7-08, and the 260

Well, one has the ability to deliver heavier bullets for less wind drift.............
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:38 PM
mrfudd mrfudd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Augusta
iTrader: (4) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twenty five ought six View Post
Which caliber would you suggest has a lot of room for bad shots?
50 BMG, 20mm?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:38 PM
Buzz's Avatar
Buzz Buzz is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not far enough NW of Atlanta
iTrader: (13) Check/Add Feedback
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
I agree........just saying. The real point is the 260 leaves little room for bad shots. Not that that is an excuse, people kill deer with 223's every year. There is just not a lot of room for error.
The thought that a .260 Remington is in anyway shape or form marginal for deer is a bad joke. There isn't a penny worth a difference in game performance between the .260 Remington and a 7mm/08, or about 20 other chamberings for that matter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 Georgia Outdoor News, Inc.Ad Management by RedTyger