Welcome Guest!
denying parts of the bible
- Thread starter FritzMichaels
- Start date
Thread starter
#22
No sweat my friend. I just hate that someone wrecked your faith though...
Thread starter
#24
Its all good. 
That is not news to me . Those books were left out for a reason, so would you like to tell us what that reason was?
Sounds like you dont believe any of it, so why do you believe what you believe? How do you have faith in nothing? How do you have faith in what others tell you is a fact? Looks like you are ready to believe the word of men you dont even know, but not Gods word.
As Iv said so many times before, nothing new under the sun.
Sounds like you dont believe any of it, so why do you believe what you believe? How do you have faith in nothing? How do you have faith in what others tell you is a fact? Looks like you are ready to believe the word of men you dont even know, but not Gods word.
As Iv said so many times before, nothing new under the sun.
The Gospel of the Hebrews didn't make the cut.
Why? It is controversial because it casts doubt upon the Virgin Birth and other teachings of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches.
The Gospel of Thomas didn't make the cut either, Why?
may have been excluded because it was believed
- not to have been written close to the time of Jesus
- not to have been written by apostolic authority
or was forged in Thomas' name
- to be heretical or unorthodox[59]
- not to have been useful or comprehensible
- to be secret - or for adepts
as the first sentence of the gospel declares.
The Gospel of Peter same situation
- is widely thought to date from after Peter's death.
- Scholars generally agree on a date
'in the second half of the 2nd century.
The Gospel of Judas same
- is probably from no earlier than the second century
- it's theology is not represented before the 2nd half of the second century
- and since its introduction and epilogue assume the reader is familiar with the canonical Gospels.
The Coptic Gospel of Egyptians same question
Third-or fourth-century Gnostic writing; recounts a Gnostic myth in which Jesus is presented as a reincarnation of Seth, the third son of Adam and Eve.
No early Christian writer considered this document to have any authority for believers or any place among the canonical Scriptures.
Mostly because they're later writings of people trying to get their beliefs accepted as doctrine.
Why? It is controversial because it casts doubt upon the Virgin Birth and other teachings of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches.
The Gospel of Thomas didn't make the cut either, Why?
may have been excluded because it was believed
- not to have been written close to the time of Jesus
- not to have been written by apostolic authority
or was forged in Thomas' name
- to be heretical or unorthodox[59]
- not to have been useful or comprehensible
- to be secret - or for adepts
as the first sentence of the gospel declares.
The Gospel of Peter same situation
- is widely thought to date from after Peter's death.
- Scholars generally agree on a date
'in the second half of the 2nd century.
The Gospel of Judas same
- is probably from no earlier than the second century
- it's theology is not represented before the 2nd half of the second century
- and since its introduction and epilogue assume the reader is familiar with the canonical Gospels.
The Coptic Gospel of Egyptians same question
Third-or fourth-century Gnostic writing; recounts a Gnostic myth in which Jesus is presented as a reincarnation of Seth, the third son of Adam and Eve.
No early Christian writer considered this document to have any authority for believers or any place among the canonical Scriptures.
Mostly because they're later writings of people trying to get their beliefs accepted as doctrine.
just curious,
why do you think this will happen, not trying to be rude, but where does it say the word rapture in the bible.
about the part of knowing when you got saved, agian not being rude, why does this matter? Not that its a bad thing that somebody does know but is it relavant to one being saved?
why do you think this will happen, not trying to be rude, but where does it say the word rapture in the bible.
about the part of knowing when you got saved, agian not being rude, why does this matter? Not that its a bad thing that somebody does know but is it relavant to one being saved?
Thread starter
#31
where is the word, "bible" in the bible? since "bible" is not in the bible, therefore the bible does not exist... 
Thread starter
#32
what makes you think that the saints will be raptured "out of the world"? if the saints are raptured out, wouldnt that leave the earth for the wicked? who are the co-heirs of the earth (everything), the saints or the wicked? just think about the premil pretrib position for a moment. if Jesus returns and takes his saints to heaven, then reigns on the earth for 1000 years... that wouldnt be much of reign... he would be here with all the wicked and the saints would be in heaven... ???
where is the word, "bible" in the bible? since "bible" is not in the bible, therefore the bible does not exist...
My question is why people think God could create and maintain this world but couldn't make sure His Word wasn't "tainted" or " mistranslated", etc. by mere men ???
where is the word, "bible" in the bible? since "bible" is not in the bible, therefore the bible does not exist...
The fact is that the bible does not say that one day christians will all disappear and its called the rapture.
There is something called the law of non-condradictory, you cant say "the word bible is not in the bible", the second part of that statement states the fact that there is a bible.
The fact is that the bible does not say that one day christians will all disappear and its called the rapture.
The fact is that the bible does not say that one day christians will all disappear and its called the rapture.
your right, the word rapture just made to many people to much money.