The Two Gospels

[NoOne]

The Two Gospels, the Gospel of the Kingdom and the Gospel of the Grace of God

 

[NoOne]

Rightly dividing the Word of Truth

 

[NoOne]

The Two Gospels, two different dispensations

 

[NoOne]

Prophesy and the Mystery, the Secret that interrupted prophesy

 

[NoOne]

Paul's Apostleship and message

 

[NoOne]

Those that pervert the Gospel of Grace are accursed

 

[NoOne]

Paul the Apostle to the Gentiles (us)

 

[NoOne]

Coming out of religion into the Grace of God

 

[NoOne]

Galations 2 and the Jerusalem conference

 

[NoOne]

The ministry of the 12 and the Apostle Paul's ministry

 

[Use Enough Gun]

I have been watching Les Feldick on CTN here in Florida , he makes some interesting points of the gospel of the Kingdom and Paul's gospel.

He has been hammering I John as a Jewish epistle and says 1Jonh 1:9 does not apply to us. Do not sure I agree with his approach on Epistles of John as being Kingdom gospels only, plan to research my books on these Epistles. I am studying names of God right now but will finish tomorrow.

 

[Israel]

I listened to about 6 minutes of the last vid posted.

It seems the case is being made that all except Paul (based loosely around Paul's refusal to be impressed by the mere stature and repute of men) had somehow "missed" that with which they had been entrusted.

Yet Paul also writes:

(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles)

in Galatians

And in letters to the Corinthians does not seek to exceed either the message nor stature of Peter (nor even Apollos) when writing

Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

and

For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

It sounds rather (to me) cultish, elevating Paul to a stature he denied among the "other" apostles and workers.

 

[hummerpoo]

I listened to about 6 minutes of the last vid posted.

It seems the case is being made that all except Paul (based loosely around Paul's refusal to be impressed by the mere stature and repute of men) had somehow "missed" that with which they had been entrusted.

Yet Paul also writes:

in Galatians

And in letters to the Corinthians does not seek to exceed either the message nor stature of Peter (nor even Apollos) when writing



and




It sounds rather (to me) cultish, elevating Paul to a stature he denied among the "other" apostles and workers.

IMO, that's what happens when men expect to find theological answers when asking only anthropological questions.

 

[NoOne]

The gospel of the circumcision and the gospel of the uncircumcision

 

[Madman]

IMO, that's what happens when men expect to find theological answers when asking only anthropological questions.

Yep, and IMO that is what happens when men 2000+ years removed from the writings and 1500 years removed from the great councils, and do not study nor have a inkling of the language nor the true culture, believe they can open a modern translation and 100% of the time "Rightly divide".

Many errant paths have flowed out of that they have.

 

[NoOne]

The Acts 15 conference and Galations 2:9-14

 

[NoOne]

Law and Grace

 

[NoOne]

Faith plus nothing

 

[NoOne]

The Two Gospels

 

[NoOne]

The two Gospels Pastor Joel Finck