stringmusic
Senior Member
The only problem with that is you can’t replace an ideology with a building.None needed. Slap an Arby's on top of whatever last mosk or temple was there and make enough room for a drive thru.
The only problem with that is you can’t replace an ideology with a building.None needed. Slap an Arby's on top of whatever last mosk or temple was there and make enough room for a drive thru.
Even I will give an Amen to that.The only problem with that is you can’t replace an ideology with a building.
I'm working on it. I guarantee that it will have better music.Then you have the problem of what ideology to replace it with in which the modern secular world has no fulfilling answer.
Extinction happens at such large scale and doesn't seem like it will end.Yes, religion or not, it's understandable. There's evidence and circumstantial evidence of genocide or attempts of it in different ages of time all around the globe. It's an animalistic part of human nature to wipe out competitors for resources.
I expect no less than a personal signed copy of the book and front row concert tickets!I'm working on it. I guarantee that it will have better music.
I had forgotten all about that Bible story. Judges 15:15-17This is a thousands years old peeing match over which Invisible buddy is greather than the other and all each does is strengthen the belief and resolve of the their enemy for every body they stack.
Nobody sends an angel with a jawbone to kill 185,000 at a time anymore.
Yes, very animalistic. Too bad a deity - a creator of the universe/angry storm god - couldn't have came down to Earth and taught some animalistic humans - maybe humans in the Near East/Mesopotamian region for example - a better way to behave! If memory serves, that deity committed genocide and encouraged his chosen people to commit genocide on a regular basis. I guess that didn't pan out.Yes, religion or not, it's understandable. There's evidence and circumstantial evidence of genocide or attempts of it in different ages of time all around the globe. It's an animalistic part of human nature to wipe out competitors for resources.
The Arby's building IS an ideology.The only problem with that is you can’t replace an ideology with a building.
Isn't that a Netanyahu quote? I know it wasn't Mark Twain. But it's probably a good attitude to have in Israel.“If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel'.”
True ^^^
Isn't that a Netanyahu quote?
You guess wrong. Figure it out.I guess that didn't pan out.
The deity of the "chosen people" was NOT incredibly genocidal? I have Bible versus that state that he was indeed genocidal. Justified? Not justified? It's a moot point - genocide for any reason is still genocide. I'm not judging, I'm just saying that it is so sad that a deity that is all powerful can't take care of business in a less genocidal manner. I totally get that humans are genocidal, but I can't see why a perfect deity would have to be.You guess wrong. Figure it out.
I'm on the side of Israel but this saying is a bit lame. Mainly because what the other side is fighting for.“If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel'.”
True ^^^
According to the Old Testament, God might help Israel and he might not.The annihilation thing reminds me of Sherman's march(scorched earth policy) which was bad but his leaders knew what he was gonna do. Us Southerners think it was terrible but perhaps it broke our moral and ended the war quicker.
Fast forward to WWII and the atomic bombs dropped on Japan. It sorta messed with their moral but it did end the war on that front sooner. Kind of like the Scorched Earth Policy.
So as bad as it is, I'm OK with Israel doing it. But only from a non-Christian standpoint.
From a Christian standpoint and to the OP. If God commands Israel to do it, wouldn't God also intervene and help Israel succeed?
I'm on the side of Israel but this saying is a bit lame. Mainly because what the other side is fighting for.
In a nutshell, Palestine wants their own sovereign state/country like Israel has. Hamas is the ruling political party (and Palestine's military - sort of) that attacked Israel.What is the other side fighting for?
In a nutshell, Palestine wants their own sovereign state/country like Israel has.