Interesting article on 0-9 from an sec writer

Madsnooker

Senior Member
Thought this was a good read. Doesn't help an OSU fan cause it is what it is.:O

Also, the end of the article talks about nfl draft picks and shows just how close these conferences have historically been. SEC does have more overall picks but that is because they have one more team.

Again, just thought it was a good read. I didn't post it to make excuses.;)

This was written in 07 I believe



Ohio State vs SEC

Great News!! We are always wanting more SEC vs Big Ten match-ups (especially in the regular season). Well, now we've got one. Tennessee and Ohio State just announced they will play each other in 2018 (at Tenn) and 2019 (at OSU) seasons.

The last time they played was in the 1996 Florida Citrus Bowl -- with UT winning -- of course.

January 08 Update -- OSU is now 0-9 All-Time vs the SEC in Bowl Games. That's one amazing statistic!

Ohio State vs. The SEC: 0-8


Ohio State is 0-8 vs the SEC in bowl games. Chalk up one for the SEC. Heck, chalk up eight for the SEC. 0-8 is 0-8. It can't be defended. But in this case it can be explained.

The mounting second number after the dash is brought to the forefront each year around bowl time when the Big Ten vs the SEC, which is the best conference, debate rages at its most fierce. That second number reached eight when Ohio State was unexpectedly humiliated by Florida in the National Championship game.

As a Buckeyes' fan it seemed as though 0-8 was plastered all over every ESPN family of networks' graphic for the ensuing 24 hours. My co-workers who love to debate college football picked up on the newly adjusted record and quickly used it as bullet number one in the battle over best conference.

For weeks we had been punching and counter-punching Big Ten vs SEC. Starting on January 9th, I would've thought the Buckeyes' lost eight games to the SEC this year. My pro-SEC debaters would boldly proclaim SEC superiority followed by their most convincing argument: Ohio State is 0-8 vs the SEC. It was used so many times against me I started to doubt what I'd seen for the past three months. I checked the Buckeyes' schedule for that shocking defeat to Vanderbilt at the Horseshoe and what about that embarrassment at Scott Field in Starkville, MS?

In reality, what I did was first explain in a most sarcastic tone that they could only use 0-1 as part of their argument for best conference. I took even great joy in asking them when this streak started. I knew no one had a clue.

The streak started under Woody Hayes. Most of my debaters know the name; know about the famous tantrums, but if they've ever seen the man stroll the sidelines it was on Zibrudor film quality on ESPN Classic.

On January 1, 1978, one year prior to winning their first of two consecutive national championships, Alabama whipped Ohio State 35-6. I watched that Sugar Bowl in horror. But my first two seasons as a Buckeyes' fan were also Woody Hayes' final two as Buckeyes' coach. Never a tactical genius, Woody had obviously lost the edge that drove his teams to outwork and out-will their opponents. Penn State, Oklahoma, Purdue, Michigan and Clemson in his last game. Woody lost all the big games in his final two seasons. That Alabama team finished 11-1 and # 2 in the country.



Tony Nathan scores first TD in Alabama’s drubbing of Ohio State (35-6) in the 1978 Sugar Bowl. Another SEC win vs OSU!

Earle Bruce succeeded Hayes and went 81-26-1 over nine seasons. He won four Big Ten Championships, finished in the Top Ten four times, went 5-4 vs Michigan and 5-3 in bowl games. Bruce never faced the SEC in a bowl game, losing to Alabama in the 1986 Kickoff Classic 16-10 and tying LSU in Baton Rouge in 1987. The Bama game was a hard fought clash between top ten teams. In '87 LSU and Ohio State faced as top five teams, but OSU stumbled to a 6-4-1 finish. LSU went 10-1-1.

Now we talk the John Cooper factor. Despite a number of accomplishments on paper, Buckeyes' fans look back on those 13 years with disappointment and disgust. Cooper coached 157 games in Columbus. Change the result of just a few of those contests and Cooper is now a legend. Despite winning 11 games three times and 10 games twice Cooper's legacy is losing the big game.

The SEC beat Cooper five times. But Cooper was an equal opportunity whipping boy. Michigan beat him 10 times out of 12 decisions and he lost 8 of 11 bowl games. Cooper lost the 1990 Liberty Bowl to Air Force as a 17 point favorite. He lost that game with Robert Smith in the backfield, three NFL receivers and a defense stocked with more pros. Some coaches know how to find a way to win. Cooper found a way to lose.

That said, Cooper's best teams didn't play the SEC in the postseason. The 1996 and '98 squads finished # 2 in the country after winning the Rose and Sugar Bowls against the Pac Ten and Big 12.

Before the current format of bowl slotting, prestigous programs like Ohio State were elevated to bowl games they didn't deserve. The 1989 Buckeyes finished 24th in the country, but played a top five Auburn team in the Hall of Fame Bowl. The '92 edition lost on a late touchdown to Georgia in the Citrus. UGA finished 8th. OSU finished 18th.

In 1994, 12-1 Alabama scored a touchdown in the closing minute to beat four times beaten Ohio State. Buckeyes' fans should credit Cooper with re-establishing OSU as a talent factory. But those teams routinely underachieved against everybody. Matching them up against higher rated SEC teams skews the equation greatly.

Following two paragraphs of Cooper bashing, I let the embattled coach exit this article with a blaze of glory. His first team at OSU; that terrible 4-6-1 group, beat a top five LSU team 36-33. Thank you Greg Frey and Bobby Olive. Go Bucks!

On the dawn of January 8th Jim Tressel was nearing sainthood. A few hours later such talk had been silenced. The Buckeyes were demolished. I've watched the game three times and each look makes it even less believable.

For as badly as the players were beaten, Tressel was outwitted ten times over. The man with a velvet touch in the big game served up a ragged game plan. He left his offensive tackles to fend for themselves well after it was proven that help was needed. He called three straight pass plays after his running game accounted for a touchdown to close the game to 21-14.

And worst of all, he refused to let the defense loose. He never challenged receivers and never forced Chris Leak to make a difficult throw. Florida's offense somehow thrived by running for 3.4 yards per carry and throwing the ball downfield once.

Buckeye defenders missed few tackles. It simply took an eternity to close on the ball. I never saw an OSU cornerback lineup on my TV screen. I begged Defensive Coordinator Jim Heacock to force Leak to make an NFL throw. Just one, please?

Tressel's glossy big game record has picked up two smudges courtesy the SEC. His first team lost on a last second field goal to South Carolina 31-28. That team lost five games. That game could've gone either way. Those two teams could've won or lost against forty other teams in American on any given day.

The next year the Buckeyes jelled, navigated a rugged schedule and beat the unbeatable Miami Hurricanes to win the national championship.

Even the most ardent SEC supporters can't tell me that their conference champion, Georgia, would've won that game. Same thing for the '05 season, Tressel's second best team finished 4th in the country. SEC champ Georgia was ripped for 38 points by West Virginia. Give OSU that matchup too.

Penn State is 5-2 vs the SEC since 1990. Michigan owns the same mark. OSU's 0-6 record against the Southeastern Conference during that time would point to disaster against its two most competitive conference rivals, but we know better. The Buckeyes own the Big Ten's best record during that time and have won 15 of 27 against Joe Pa and the Maize and Blue.

The SEC argument is simple. 8-0 means we're better. Careful examination shows that timing can distort the meaning of eight games spread over 30 years. Reasoning doesn't change results, but it should change rationale.


____________________________________________
This article was submitted by Mark Rogers. Mark has worked in television for 16 years...9 years as a sportscaster...6 years covering the SEC (mostly Alabama, MSU and Ole Miss). For the past five years he has worked at ESPN in Network Operations.
____________________________________________

UPDATE FROM MARK ROGERS

Hi Mo, Thanks for posting my column. I did some research concerning which conference has currently produced the most NFL players. As of opening day 2006 the two conferences are basically dead even. The Big Ten leads by .1 percent per school. >

> SEC

> Georgia 43
> Tennessee 42
> LSU 38
> Florida 37
> Auburn 29
> Ole Miss 21
> Alabama 21
> South Carolina 21
> Miss State 17
> Arkansas 13
> Vanderbilt 10
> Kentucky 6
> Total 298
>

> Big Ten

> Ohio State 43
> Michigan 38
> Purdue 35
> Penn State 32
> Wisconsin 30
> Iowa 23
> Michigan State 19
> Illiniois 17
> Minnesota 13
> Northwestern 13
> Indiana 11
> Total 274
>

> There are 12 teams in the SEC and 11 in the Big Ten so the SEC averages 24.8 players per school. The Big Ten averages 24.9. >
 
Last edited:

RipperIII

Senior Member
Snook, two games that I remember vividly are the 78 sugar bowl when my Tide drubbed the buckeyes, and the next season's gator?bowl vs. Clemson.
I was a freshman at BAMA and dating a girl whose dad was a coach at Clemson, I liked Woody up until that point, actually laughed when he slugged the Clemson player,...then felt a profound sadness for the Man.
My beef has always been that, as this article states, the big 10 were beneficiaries of history for the better part of two decades, consistently higher ranked than they deserved,...and to some degree I believe that is still going on.
I think it is somewhat natural for the press to lean toward traditional powers such as USC, ND, OSU, UM...even somewhat toward my Tide.
The team that beat Miami was definitely a Championship caliber team.
OSU may prove themselves this season, and they are in a very favorable position to do so, I don't think that anyone outside of the SEC is pulling for a 5th consecutive SEC NC.
We'll see.
Good post.:cheers:
 

MCBUCK

Senior Member
Good post snook, and I agree with it to an extent. But I also agree with rip too...the SEC had to endure some years of media darling days with certain teams....al: ND, USC etc. But you have to admit that it is hard to get past those two NC games.
 

greene_dawg

Senior Member
Funny. I remember UGA pretty much owning OSU all day in that game smacking them square in the chin with their own game and we used on of the best names in the history of football to do it. Mr. Garrison Hearst! Loved watching Herbie squirm at QB and Robert Smith play second fiddle to a superior RB.... :)

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wCZZ7GOFtjw?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wCZZ7GOFtjw?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

coggins

Senior Member
That's got to be the most well thought out and most elaborate excuse i've ever heard. BTW, I was in Orlando in '92 & OSU fans were mighty cocky(before) the game, GO DAWGS!
 

Sugar HillDawg

Senior Member
I think it a CRIME and trajedy that Ohio State takes up a space in the top 5 that should go to another MORE worthy team!!
 

LanierSpots

Senior Member
Snook, if it is true that the Big 10 and SEC are even on talent, or the Big 10 is better according to the above, what do you attribute the success of the SEC over Ohio State and the fact that the SEC is wining more National Championships in recent years.. Coaching maybe?

I do agree that the talent throughout has evened out with the caping of scholarships. But, there is a reason that the guys down south keep winning NC's. Could it be luck?

Personally, I do think there is a coaching advantage in the SEC. Just too many good coaches. But there has to be something else. Of course, we cant judge talent by just the guys who make it to the NFL. There are some unreal players in college football that will never make it in the bigs. Look at Georgia's hero QB of the ages. David Green? How about Tebow. So many say he wont make it. Ohio States Troy Smith? Where is he now.. Along with so many Heisman winners...

I know your not making excuses, Im just wondering what you attribute the difference too? I have no real opinion other than what I stated above.
 

RipperIII

Senior Member
The break down of the number of pros from the SEC vs the Big 10 has changed since 2006,...The big 10 will always put a good number of guys in the pros, because as a whole, big 10 guys are larger physically,...lots of linemen out of the big 10
 

SFStephens

Senior Member
Don't know that I've ever read an article loaded with more excuses. Wasted five minutes of my life that I'll never get back!
 

reylamb

Senior Member
Snook, if it is true that the Big 10 and SEC are even on talent, or the Big 10 is better according to the above, what do you attribute the success of the SEC over Ohio State and the fact that the SEC is wining more National Championships in recent years.. Coaching maybe?

I do agree that the talent throughout has evened out with the caping of scholarships. But, there is a reason that the guys down south keep winning NC's. Could it be luck?

Personally, I do think there is a coaching advantage in the SEC. Just too many good coaches. But there has to be something else. Of course, we cant judge talent by just the guys who make it to the NFL. There are some unreal players in college football that will never make it in the bigs. Look at Georgia's hero QB of the ages. David Green? How about Tebow. So many say he wont make it. Ohio States Troy Smith? Where is he now.. Along with so many Heisman winners...

I know your not making excuses, Im just wondering what you attribute the difference too? I have no real opinion other than what I stated above.

Troy Smith is actually still in the league.......the Ravens maybe??????
 

LanierSpots

Senior Member
Troy Smith is actually still in the league.......the Ravens maybe??????

I cant remember and didnt look. I think there is a big difference in getting to the NFL and actually playing. A good many kids get there and never play a down...

This debate can be done in so many ways its crazy. I know the SEC leads in recent years but cant dont know a real breakdown. I did a history in the last 15 years (since 1995) and the SEC is 34-23 against the Big 10. Not really sure what that actually means either. It can be deceiving. For instance, Kentucky is 9-3 in that span against the Big 10. With 8 of those wins against Indiana???? Who cares.. But its tough to cherry pick what games count?

Point being, you can argue it all you want but really matters is the top tier teams. Who cares if Northwestern beats Vandy opening weekend? Which they will. Now I believe if we line up the top 6 teams in the SEC against the top 6 teams in the Big 10, I think the SEC will win atleast 4 of them regularly. But thats just an opinion.. Same for the Pac-10.
 

Madsnooker

Senior Member
I think it a CRIME and trajedy that Ohio State takes up a space in the top 5 that should go to another MORE worthy team!!

Yea, they have always underperformed going 5-3 in BCS games and winning a NC 8 years ago. Show me more than 3 teams or more that can say they have done better.:rolleyes:

I already posted the last 20 years of preseason rankings for OSU and where they ended up. It showed they were not overrated most of the time. Those are simply the facts.

In all honesty, I didn't post the article to prove anything or make excuses. I just thought it was a good read. If anyone thought it wasted their time, tuff.:bounce:

OSU has accomplished more than just about anyone except a handfull of teams. I'm proud to be a buckeye!!!

You guys rip all you want. I truely don't take it personal and enjoy the banter.
 

Madsnooker

Senior Member
Funny. I remember UGA pretty much owning OSU all day in that game smacking them square in the chin with their own game and we used on of the best names in the history of football to do it. Mr. Garrison Hearst! Loved watching Herbie squirm at QB and Robert Smith play second fiddle to a superior RB.... :)

QUOTE]

Not sure I would call Robert Smith inferior to Hearst although hearst was a great back that performed well that day. I just hate OSU fumbled inside the 10 yd line with a minute or two left.:cry:
 

Madsnooker

Senior Member
Snook, if it is true that the Big 10 and SEC are even on talent, or the Big 10 is better according to the above, what do you attribute the success of the SEC over Ohio State and the fact that the SEC is wining more National Championships in recent years.. Coaching maybe?

I do agree that the talent throughout has evened out with the caping of scholarships. But, there is a reason that the guys down south keep winning NC's. Could it be luck?

Personally, I do think there is a coaching advantage in the SEC. Just too many good coaches. But there has to be something else. Of course, we cant judge talent by just the guys who make it to the NFL. There are some unreal players in college football that will never make it in the bigs. Look at Georgia's hero QB of the ages. David Green? How about Tebow. So many say he wont make it. Ohio States Troy Smith? Where is he now.. Along with so many Heisman winners...

I know your not making excuses, Im just wondering what you attribute the difference too? I have no real opinion other than what I stated above.

As the article said, I attribute it more to timing of the matchups as anything. 75% of those games were very well played and OSU had chances at the end and just didn't get it done. How do you explain UM dominance of the sec 25-5 and 5-2 during the bcs years as well as Penn St and Iowa doing well. OSU has dominated them over the same period. It makes no since and proves there is much more to it than OSU being overrated and not as good as SEC teams.

I do believe the sec has better coaching overall and it has showed.

As far as NC I don't think it was luck that LSU, Uf and bama won as they were as good as anyone but there was luck involved as teams had to lose to let UF and LSU in 2 of the 4 NC games.
 

Jetjockey

Senior Member
This debate can be done in so many ways its crazy. I know the SEC leads in recent years but cant dont know a real breakdown.

Big 10 leads the SEC 97-91 all time with current conference affiliation. :pop:
 
Last edited:

Jetjockey

Senior Member
BTW.. Did you guys know that when BYU won the NC in 1984 that they didn't beat a SINGLE ranked team all year, yet they still won the National Championship! Wow! Washington finished the season #2 after beating the #2 team in the nation in the Orange Bowl, yet they didnt win the NC. And we thought the BCS was screwed up!
 

Jetjockey

Senior Member
Ok.. Penn St is 17-16 all time vs the SEC! Feel Better? :cheers:
 
Top