gordon 2
Senior Member
The bible cannon(s) we know now were not known to all Christians for a few centuries after Jesus' resurrection. How were people saved?
Both the individual and collective mouth and independent of Paul's letters? How did a sinner, a gentile and a Jew, know that an individual and the collective were authoritative? Want did a prospect have to understand from the Word of a mouth that it was authoritative?The same way any who are...are...Word of mouth...
Oral Tradition? And how was it preserved? How was it kept true to the faith? Who protected it and how?The same way any who are...are...Word of mouth...
For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
One wrote recently in quote of Yeats. The poem ends
For nothing can be sole or whole
That has not been rent.
If when we quote or speak, the Bible, a poem, a work of literature, song...a movie, cartoon, comic book, or something birthed in us, there is an investment of self (in some form or fashion) to its verity...by its endorsement. Something of us is put in place to show it, elevate it above...single it out...in a sense, prop it up.
Even if we be clearly facetious or rhetorical something of self and motive is on the table for examination.
Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He?
Is not the first sentence a question of motives set in motion that, if so...are to be seen in light of what would be the sober answer to the second?
Yet a man or men ignorant of their own motives as moving unseen by them, (but known by another) if not caring to see the plainness of the second question may well have some response of "who are you to question my motives?" Or, "before I give answer...tell me, by whose authority do you have the power to even ask?"
How often this forum is rife with that question...sometimes frankly asked...often moving as unseen beneath so much said but always seen by another..."Then, who has the authority? Who can be believed if all say 'But I am speaking truly' After all, doesn't every man think that?"
Yes.
What then is "happy talk nonsense"...and what not?
Is the first quote happy talk nonsense?
For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
And just as the faith of the Son of God teaches us through the Spirit what is is true from false did the man who wrote that...elevating it...by what authority did he, could he, speak? Or, as elsewhere rebuked, are we those who would always hold to a yes and no of things always double minded (?) as in "Oh, yes I lend myself to the endorsement of that as true (after all it's "In the Bible")...but no man can ever truly enter the second portion (or at least fully)...no man can really know it"
In "his day" the man who wrote that (this Giant of the faith...or so we may say) was probably no less accused of spouting happy talk nonsense. Or at least being so much amiss that he had in experience:
"at my first response no man stood with me"
and of so little consideration while in prison that few communicated with him.
Also writing to Timothy he felt the need to add "I lie not" when mentioning his calling as an apostle.
Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.
He would not speak thus if this were not held in some question...this man that today (almost every christian) would easily...and seemingly most assuredly have no question as to his calling. After all..."He's (and his words) are in the Bible"
Now this is easily (probably too easily) inferred that some argument is being made against some right holding of the scriptures. God forbid. Just as some might think some argument is being made against Christ's Church in holding to the Spirit's sufficiency to all things in each living stone. God forbid...for the Church is all that is constituted of such...those learning through the Spirit of Christ's sufficiency. There can and is no despising of the scripture in Christ anymore than there can be a despising of His Church.
What then is only form...what is substance.
Each of us needs to know...and often easily say we want to (know).
Jesus said a very interesting thing (captivating, really) in response to the Jews who had some question in what appeared His lack of training.
And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned? Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.
If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.
Paul said something not dissimilar in regards to certain matters that others may have had questions about.
Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.
I love Striper's response to the accusation of speaking "happy talk nonsense".
None.
None at all.