Father of all humankind is 340,000 years old

bullethead

Of the hard cast variety
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/father-humankind-340-000-years-old-210033011.html

DNA evidence has revealed that the oldest known common male ancestor is 340,000 years old, more than twice as old as previous estimates.

New Scientist reports that the sample comes from a recently deceased man named Albert Perry. After the African-American South Carolina man died, one of his relatives submitted a sample of his DNA to a company called Family Tree DNA for analysis.

The findings were published in the The American Journal of Human Genetics and may require researchers to adjust the known timeline of humankind’s evolution.

And the historical mark came at something of a bargain—the company does historical DNA analysis on individuals for about $150.

All previously compared DNA samples pointed to a common Y chromosome traced back to man who lived between 60,000 and 140,000 years ago. But Perry’s DNA sample broke the trend, not matching up with this common ancestor.

"It's a cool discovery," Jon Wilkins of the Ronin Institute in Montclair, N.J., told New Scientist. "We geneticists have been looking at Y chromosomes about as long as we've been looking at anything. Changing where the root of the Y-chromosome tree is at this point is extremely surprising."

After the initial tests on Perry’s DNA, geneticists at the University of Arizona conducted further tests to confirm the anomaly. The Y chromosome in Perry’s test matched up with those of 11 men who all lived in one village in Cameroon.

University of Arizona researcher Michael Hammer says Perry’s DNA suggests there may have been an earlier species of humans that went extinct—but not before interbreeding with the more modern version of man.
 

Ronnie T

Ol' Retired Mod
Well there ya go.
.
 

bullethead

Of the hard cast variety
Separating the wheat from the chaff is hard work sometimes but worth it.
 

mtnwoman

Senior Member
me, three.
 

Asath

Senior Member
Darn it. Now I'm going to have to reprint all the invitations to this summer's Rapture party . . .
 

Nastytater

Banned
Makes me kinda wonder how scientist got DNA from someone who lived back 60,000 to 140,000 years ago to test it against. Or am I missing something?....Probably missing my Y-Chromosome Tree huh.
 

mtnwoman

Senior Member
Darn it. Now I'm going to have to reprint all the invitations to this summer's Rapture party . . .

Don't waste a stamp on me, I've got an open invitation. I have to admit, I don't know when that will be though.

Beam me on up, Jesus.
 

Asath

Senior Member
Looks like it's been postponed by a few hundred thousand years. I'd concentrate on eating foods that are heavy in polysorbate 60, for the preservative qualities . . .
 

stringmusic

Senior Member
Don't waste a stamp on me, I've got an open invitation. I have to admit, I don't know when that will be though.

Beam me on up, Jesus.

:cool:
 

TripleXBullies

Senior Member
Makes me kinda wonder how scientist got DNA from someone who lived back 60,000 to 140,000 years ago to test it against. Or am I missing something?....Probably missing my Y-Chromosome Tree huh.

I agree...... It may be completely "logical" to get there, but since I don't understand it, it is absolutely not logical to me.
 

bullethead

Of the hard cast variety
Makes me kinda wonder how scientist got DNA from someone who lived back 60,000 to 140,000 years ago to test it against. Or am I missing something?....Probably missing my Y-Chromosome Tree huh.

Archeology
 

TripleXBullies

Senior Member
Finding something that did contain DNA... sure... Something that STILL contains DNA... that's a little more questionable to me.
 
Top