Cool Water
Member
I've been thinking about this a lot lately...
The Tybee Beach Pier is Georgia's only true Atlantic facing beach fishing pier (to my knowledge). Because of this, I feel like it has so much potential but that it's currently a bit of a joke to any serious coastal fisherman. First, at lowest tide, nearly the entire current length of the pier is out of the water. Second, gawking tourists outnumber those fishing most of the time by several multiples.
What about this? The pier is extended a further 600-700 feet beyond it's current termination point. That would more than double the current length of the pier and provide more linear feet of fishing space and deeper water fishing during all phases of the tide.
Second, a per-head fee is charged to access the extended portion of the pier past Rip Tide Tackle. I'm thinking $10 a head with an exemption for children age 12 and under would be good to start. Doesn't matter if the individual intends to fish or not, they have to pay the fee if they want access. This would effectively keep most of the tourists off the extended portion of the pier and leave it open to those who are serious about fishing. Nothing changes for the tourists and those fishermen who don't want to pay the fee. They still have free access to the pavilion and everything up to Rip Tide.
I'm of the opinion that doing this would put Tybee on the map for lower Atlantic Beach piers and would bring more money into Tybee.
Are there any problems with my thinking above? I get depressed when I compare the current state of Tybee to the piers in Myrtle Beach and Florida. So much potential as previously stated...
Maybe one day I'll start a petition to send to the city fathers, but I don't want to bother unless we can get a few thousand at least and some local businesses to co-sign.
The Tybee Beach Pier is Georgia's only true Atlantic facing beach fishing pier (to my knowledge). Because of this, I feel like it has so much potential but that it's currently a bit of a joke to any serious coastal fisherman. First, at lowest tide, nearly the entire current length of the pier is out of the water. Second, gawking tourists outnumber those fishing most of the time by several multiples.
What about this? The pier is extended a further 600-700 feet beyond it's current termination point. That would more than double the current length of the pier and provide more linear feet of fishing space and deeper water fishing during all phases of the tide.
Second, a per-head fee is charged to access the extended portion of the pier past Rip Tide Tackle. I'm thinking $10 a head with an exemption for children age 12 and under would be good to start. Doesn't matter if the individual intends to fish or not, they have to pay the fee if they want access. This would effectively keep most of the tourists off the extended portion of the pier and leave it open to those who are serious about fishing. Nothing changes for the tourists and those fishermen who don't want to pay the fee. They still have free access to the pavilion and everything up to Rip Tide.
I'm of the opinion that doing this would put Tybee on the map for lower Atlantic Beach piers and would bring more money into Tybee.
Are there any problems with my thinking above? I get depressed when I compare the current state of Tybee to the piers in Myrtle Beach and Florida. So much potential as previously stated...
Maybe one day I'll start a petition to send to the city fathers, but I don't want to bother unless we can get a few thousand at least and some local businesses to co-sign.