Wal-Mart "anti-fishing" support

The following is an article from another site. Please bear in mind this is only one side of the story. Research the article before you draw your own conclusion.
Zap

WAL-MART GIVES $36 MILLION TO ANTI-FISHING GROUPS RFA Says Walton Family Foundation Supports MPA & Catch Share Efforts

August 17, 2011 - Wal-Mart announced this week its efforts to help fund the demise of both the recreational and commercial fishing industry while also working to ensure that the next generation of sportsmen will have less access to coastal fish stocks than at any point in U.S. history.

In August 16th news release from Wal-Mart corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, the Walton Family Foundation announced investments totaling more than $71.8 million awarded to various environmental initiatives in 2010, with over $36 million alone handed over to Marine Conservation grantees including Ocean Conservancy, Conservation International Foundation, Marine Stewardship Council, World Wildlife Fund and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).

According to the release, the Walton Family Foundation "focuses on globally important marine areas and works with grantees and other partners to create networks of effectively managed protected areas that conserve key biological features, and ensure the sustainable utilization of marine resources - especially fisheries - in a way that benefits both nature and people."

Scott Burns, former director of marine conservation at World Wildlife Fund and now director of Walton Family Foundation's environmental efforts, said money will go to "protect and conserve natural resources while also recognizing the roles these waters play in the livelihoods of those who live nearby." The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) countered that these specially managed areas of coastal waters are also referred to as marine protected areas or marine reserves, and the end result is denied angler access, of no benefit to the very people whom Wal-Mart claims to benefit.

"A quick visit to the Ocean Conservancy website should be telling enough for anglers interested in learning where Wal-Mart's profits are being spent,"
said RFA executive director Jim Donofrio. "These folks are pushing hard to complete California's network of exclusionary zones throughout the entire length of coastline, and they've made it very clear that they would like to see the West Coast version of the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) extended into other coastal U.S. waters," he said.

The release said that targeted marine areas moving forward include Indonesia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Panama, the Gulf of California and the Gulf of Mexico.

"Here's an organization which has publicly opposed creation of artificial reefs used by Wal-Mart's tackle buyers, in some cases openly advocating for their removal, yet the Walton family is handing over tons of money for support," Donofrio said of Ocean Conservancy in particular.

"Shopping for fishing equipment at Wal-Mart is contributing directly to the demise of our sport, it's supporting lost fishing opportunities and decreased coastal access for all Americans," Donofrio said, adding "I hope all RFA members across the country will remember that when it's time to gear up, but I would also wonder if perhaps our industry can help spread the message and support our local tackle shops by also pulling product off Wal-Mart's shelves."

In April, RFA announced its support of a national boycott of the Safeway Supermarket chain (which also includes Genuardi's in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware) because of that corporation's support for California's MLPA initiative. "Apparently Safeway has gotten some bad advice from the people in the ocean protection racket, a community to which the California-based mega-corporation is now donating profits," said Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director of the RFA. "Safeway says it is supporting groups that make a difference like the Food Marketing Institute's Sustainable Seafood Working Group, the Conservation Alliance for Seafood Solutions and the World Wildlife Fund's Aquaculture Dialogues, but it's little more than corporate greenwashing."

RFA believes it's time that Wal-Mart was added to the angler boycott list as well.

"The Walton family created this huge corporate entity which has threatened the vibrancy of our local retail outlets, and now they're essentially doing the same thing with our fishing communities," Donofrio said. "Much like Safeway has done with their financial investment in the environmental business community, Wal-Mart apparently prefers customers buy farm-raised fish and seafood caught by foreign countries outside of U.S. waters, while denying individual anglers the ability to head down to the ocean to score a few fish for their own table."

According to the official release, the Walton Family Foundation is also working "to create economic incentives for ocean conservation," while candidly pledging their support for "projects that reverse the incentives to fish unsustainably that exist in 'open access fisheries' by creating catch share programs."

"Our local outfitters and tackle shops along the coast have had to face an immense challenge by going up against Wal-Mart's purchasing power during the last decade, but now that the Walton family is so up front about their opposition to open access fisheries, it's hard for me to believe that any sportsmen would ever be interested in shopping there again," Donofrio said.

"California anglers have been outraged to learn that money they spend at a Safeway grocery store might end up in the hands of extremist, anti-fishing groups like the EDF and the Ocean Conservancy, I hope more anglers will join the national boycott by sending a message to Wal-Mart as well as Safeway,"
Martin added.

According to the Walton Family Foundation website, Sam and Helen Walton launched their "modest retail business in 1962" with guiding principle of helping "increase opportunity and improve the lives of others along the way." It is that principle the foundation says, that makes them "more focused than ever on sustaining the Walton's timeless small-town values and deep commitment to making life better for individuals and communities alike."

RFA said grassroots efforts to combat the anti-fishing agenda are more than just an uphill climb. "The EDF catch share coffers are already filled to the top, while Pew Charitable Trusts has billions in reserve," Donofrio said.
"When you add another $36 million annual commitment from the Walton family each year, I can't see how our local efforts can get anywhere unless the national manufacturers step up and openly denounce this corporate takeover once and for all."

"The individual anglers and local business owners are being denied opportunity, and I hope the federal trade representatives are willing to get onboard with their support of real small-town values," Donofrio said, adding that Ocean Conservancy and EDF combined received more than $10 million in Walton Family Foundation grants in 2010.
 
B

breampole

Guest
boycott

Well that does it for me. I'll buy elsewhere. Don't buy at Home Depot any more either for similar reasons--where they give money.
 

mtr3333

Banned
Ttt

Nothing that caught this came from Walmart.
 

Attachments

  • PB Cat.jpg
    PB Cat.jpg
    115.8 KB · Views: 915

mtr3333

Banned
Yup. The headline sponsor of the FLW Tour is anti-fishing.:rolleyes:
That is one crazy thing. Sponsor the largest group of tournaments in the world just to put the money to end fishing. Walmart is ICE only for me anyway with any sporting goods.
 

GoldDot40

Senior Member
Seems people are misreading what's going on....

From the Walton Family Foundation website. This is what they contributed to these organizations in 2009 alone...
Freshwater and Marine Conservation Grants
Marine Conservation Areas
Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fishermen's Association Inc. $250,000

Cayetano Heredia Foundation $117,875

Comunidad y Biodiversidad, A.C $651,150

Conservation International Foundation $10,989,768

Consultative Group on Biological Diversity $80,000

Ecology Project International $444,250

Ecotrust $125,000

Environmental Defense Fund $13,563,680

Environmental Law Institute $136,903

Fondo Mexicano para la Conservacion $304,096

John G. Shedd Aquarium Society $100,000

Marine Fish Conservation Network $62,500

Marine Stewardship Council $1,700,000

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation $1,000,000

National Geographic Society $100,000

Nature Conservancy Inc. $341,119

Noroeste Sustentable $572,459

Ocean Conservancy $2,352,919

Pronatura Notoeste AC $42,087

RARE $186,773

San Diego Society of Natural History $191,487

Seaweb $227,820

Sociedad de Historia Natural Niparaja A.C. $462,389

Trust for Conservation Innovation $1,037,913

University of California Regents $102,000

Wild Salmon Center $425,000

World Wildlife Fund $624,944

Marine Conservation Areas Total = $36,192,593

Freshwater Conservation
Ag Technology and Environmental Stewardship Foundation Inc. $88,850

American Whitewater $30,000

Boulder Community Foundation $25,000

Ceres $50,000

Colorado Environmental Coalition $31,991

Colorado Water Trust $56,500

Ducks Unlimited $94,075

Environmental Defense Fund $2,447,095

Environmental Working Group $50,000

Grand Canyon Trust $45,000

High Country Citizens Alliance $38,600

Land Stewardship Project $100,000

Meridian Institute $74,548

Mississippi Fish and Wildlife Foundation $175,000

Mississippi's Lower Delta Partnership $55,000

National Audubon Society $1,184,542

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation $132,500

National Geographic Society $123,980

National Wildlife Federation $1,011,425

National Wildlife Refuge Association $50,000

Nature Conservancy $37,750

Nature Conservancy Inc. $749,009

Practical Farmers of Iowa $50,000

Princeton University $60,967

Pronatura Notoeste AC $33,250

San Juan Citizens Alliance $25,650

Sand County Foundation $176,824

Southwest Conservation Corps $65,659

Tamarisk Coalition $401,152

Trout Unlimited $90,000

University of Colorado Foundation $53,965

Western Conservation Foundation $125,000

Western Resource Advocates $81,344

Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Corporation $47,169

Colorado State University Foundation $89,828

Freshwater Conservation Total = $7,951,673

Other Environment Related Grants
Philanthropy Roundtable $50,000

Aspen Center for Environmental Studies $15,000

Conservation International Foundation $10,000,000

Earth Ocean Farms USA, LLC $100,000

Ecology Project International $60,000

Global Explorers $50,000

Grand Canyon River Guides $10,000

Herring Gut Learning Center $10,000

ICF - International Community Foundation $27,115

Nature Conservancy - Arizona $25,000

Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc. $25,000

Nature Conservancy, Inc. - Arkansas $252,396

University of Montana Foundation $500,000

Sustainable Northwest $265,000

Texas A&M University-Kingsville $15,000

Walden Woods Project $25,000

Wild Salmon Center $25,000

Other Environment Related Grants Total = $11,454,512

FRESHWATER AND MARINE CONSERVATION TOTAL
$55,598,778
From what I read on the Ocean Conservancy website, they are not 'anti-fishing'. Seems to me they are just trying to clean up the water and prevent the wrong species (or endangered) fish from being caught when it's not targeted.:huh:
 

mtr3333

Banned
And from the Ocean Conservancy site:

http://www.oceanconservancy.org/splash/

In response, the state passed the landmark act in 1999. The law requires creation of a statewide network of underwater parks where human impacts like fishing are fully or partially prohibited, to give marine life and habitat a chance to recover and thrive.
 

ngoodson

Banned
From their site as well:

Protecting marine ecosystems through protected area designations is critical for biodiversity conservation. However, people and communities living in or around protected areas must be given sufficient consideration in the conservation equation.

Bypassing populations who depend on marine resources not only restricts livelihoods and economic development, but it also runs the risk of limiting the achievement of conservation goals. In order to achieve success, people must be allowed to interact with and benefit from their surrounding environment so long as it is both responsible and sustainable.

Conservation International addresses these issues by looking at balancing and linking economic development with biodiversity conservation goals. This fosters community relations that not only cultivate interest in conservation objectives, but also raise living standards for community members.
 

ngoodson

Banned
I did some research on the RFA and one of its main guys, Jim Hutchinson Jr. It seems like the RFA is really just a lobby group funded by tackle and watercraft manufacturers. I thought that there had to be some sort of ulterior motive...I mean, why would anyone knowingly say "go ahead, lets just fish all we want and not worry about tomorrow"?...I'm pretty sure the RFA is more concerned with profits...so my freedom to fish means more fishing gear purchased. I don't have the answer...
 

centerpin fan

Senior Member
I thought that there had to be some sort of ulterior motive...

Yeah, I think this is as much about “Walmart hate” as anything. This is a telling quote from the article:

"The Walton family created this huge corporate entity which has threatened the vibrancy of our local retail outlets ..."

This guy didn't like Walmart to start with.

Also, I defy anybody who owns an F-150 to go on the Ford Foundation website and tell me they agree with every contribution they make. Whatever Walmart is doing, I guarantee that Ford is doing a hundred times over. I’m not as familiar with the GM Foundation, but I’m sure that they give to the same enviro-loon groups that Ford does.

If you boycotted every company that contributed money to a cause you disagreed with, you’d be growing your own food, sewing your own clothes, and walking everywhere. You wouldn't have a cell phone or even a land line, and you certainly wouldn't own a computer.
 

porkbelly

Senior Member
I'm much more concerned about all the companys that have taken our jobs overseas. Should we boycott all of them? I don't think we could cause we couldn't buy much.
 

NCHillbilly

Administrator
Staff member
I guess the fishing will be a lot better when there is no clean water left, and everything is polluted and all the remaining fish are caught down to the last one. And hunting will be much better when the whole world is industrialized and all the woods are cut down. Down with environmental groups! Durn tree huggers, trying to save fish and wildlife. All us outdoorsmen need to be rabidly anti-environmental. It's not like we fish and hunt out there in the environment, who needs it?
 
Top