suburbanman
Member
my father has passed on to me a Remington 700 .25 06 24" barrel with a beautiful walnut stock with fleur de lis checkering. (Vintage?? I should include some pics) It was never really his gun in that he used it; he just got a good deal on it, then gave it to me. I've only had the chance to shoot it at 50 yards and of course its accurate enough to hunt with.
But if I am to make this my primary hunting rilfe, well my first thought is that it's a little too pretty. The stock is like new and I don't want to be the one to give it its first ding and dent. A friend suggested I get a synthetic stock and put away the wood stock. So finally, here is my question:
Has anyone had a bad experience with changing out stocks on 700s? Are the barrels of older 700s locked into the older wood stocks in such a way that you can't duplicate this with a synthetic stock. I've read some mention of "pressure points" and I know a floated barrel can (but may not always) improve accuracy.
(another option would be to take the cost of a good synthetic stock, add to that the money from selling this gun, and just buy something new...)
But if I am to make this my primary hunting rilfe, well my first thought is that it's a little too pretty. The stock is like new and I don't want to be the one to give it its first ding and dent. A friend suggested I get a synthetic stock and put away the wood stock. So finally, here is my question:
Has anyone had a bad experience with changing out stocks on 700s? Are the barrels of older 700s locked into the older wood stocks in such a way that you can't duplicate this with a synthetic stock. I've read some mention of "pressure points" and I know a floated barrel can (but may not always) improve accuracy.
(another option would be to take the cost of a good synthetic stock, add to that the money from selling this gun, and just buy something new...)