Throwback
Chief Big Taw
Does not speaking english make someone inelligable to own a firearm?
most people I know don't speak english
T
Does not speaking english make someone inelligable to own a firearm?
It could be that her husband is not a US citizen and does not speek english. It is not a straw purchase if her husband can legally posess a firearm, which he can if he is a resident alien.
It probably was covered before in this thread, but the only way it was a straw purchase is if he doesn't legally qualify to purchase a firearm himself, regardless of what language he speaks. Definitely a curious situation, but given the gist of what Packrat posted, there are bigger fish to fry on this topic. If the gentleman wanted a firearm for ill gotten reasons, there was no need to go to a dealer to get one, there are tons on the market available for purchase without going through the legal channels.
That's not entirely correct. For instance, let's say that your neighbor can get a LE discount for a Glock if he buys it, but you can't. Both of you are legally eligible to purchase and possess firearms. You give your neighbor the cash to purchase the firearm and as a favor to you, he goes and buys it for you and fills aout all the paperwork as if he were buying it for himself. That is a straw purchase and can net you 5 in the federal pen.
It has nothing to do with eligibility. That's just the most common reason for people making straw purchases. The las says that the 4473 MUST be filled out by the actual purchaser. That's one of the very first questions on the form.
If you are buying the gun as a gift for someone else, then you are the actual purchaser. If you are not buying it as a gift and you are not buying it for yourself, then it is a straw purchase...simple as that.
You took liberties with my phrasing and twisted it's intent.
I quoted you verbatim and didn't change a thing in your post so I'm not sure how I twisted anything....I certainly wasn't trying to. Here's what you said:
"the only way it was a straw purchase is if he doesn't legally qualify to purchase a firearm himself, regardless of what language he speaks. "
So, what was the intent? If I did twist something somehow, please accept my apologies....I was only pointing out what I saw as an incorrect statement on a fairly important point....certainly not trying to start anything.
That's not entirely correct.
It has nothing to do with eligibility..
Eligibility implies privilege, not legal position, which would be correct if we were talking sales to special interest, but I am referencing the basis for the legal ability to buy a firearm to begin with, special interest eligibility is above and beyond the legal qualification.
IF she was using HIS info ,it was legal.
IF it was a gift for him, it was legal.
How do you know he wasnt a citizen?
Read "instructions to the transferee/buyer", paragraph 1. on the back of the 4473. Let us know what it says.
Unable to speak english isnt good enough to deny someones second
Would this be considered a straw purchase?