dtala
Senior Member
I NEVER ever pass on a chance to kill a yote
I remember seeing a clear browse line in the CNF in the early ‘70’s and the largest canine there then was a red fox.I know the deer population in the Chattahoochee NF is horrible. No timber harvest so no edge, mast crops that are not a sure thing from year to year.... Until you get some edge habitat and/or a blight resistant chestnut is ever developed and allowed on public land you are not going to have a lot of deer. One of the issues US Fish and Game had with the red wolves in the Smoky Mnts was low deer numbers in most of the park, though there are some concentrations in areas with decent edge habitat. You head just a couple of counties over from the CNF though to Elbert Co. and ...at least it used to be, 100+ deer a square mile, I do not know what it is now...but a few decades ago they were everywhere. All the woods had a very visible browse line.
How come this hybridization only occurs in the east? How come there are no yellow colorations or curly hair? The report you quoted said that here was “one study” that showed the black coloration came from the dogs of the Native Americans. Native Americans had dogs out west as well yet no black coloration out there. I’m really not trying to be argumentative, but I sincerely question the conclusions from one study. The DNA conclusions given doesn’t mean they have found all the answers. It just doesn’t add up.Coyotes in GA are just a hybridized version of the same western coyote. In GA, they are 90% coyote, 5% wolf, and 5% dog...the wolf dog mating happened some 100 and 50 years ago respectively...
https://theconversation.com/yes-eastern-coyotes-are-hybrids-but-the-coywolf-is-not-a-thing-50368
There are something less than 50 known red wolves alive...and wolves, dogs, and coyotes are not interbreeding...they have no need to...
How come this hybridization only occurs in the east? How come there are no yellow colorations or curly hair? The report you quoted said that here was “one study” that showed the black coloration came from the dogs of the Native Americans. Native Americans had dogs out west as well yet no black coloration out there. I’m really not trying to be argumentative, but I sincerely question the conclusions from one study. The DNA conclusions given doesn’t mean they have found all the answers. It just doesn’t add up.
In the article it states that the black coloration came from interbreeding with dogs brought into this country by Native Americans yet it doesn’t occur out west? That’s what doesn’t add up. Then in the very next paragraph it states the timing of interbreeding with dogs can be dated to 50 years ago?. So, which is it? It doesn’t add up.Not sure what you mean doesn't add up...the wolf breeding came from a lack of mates...same with the dog breeding...happened in the east as that is where we settled, killed all the game, and cut down the forests...and we started in the east trying to exterminate the wolf and the coyote...they can trace the timing of the genetic changes...the study cited is actually an academic paper...and goes back to prehistoric times...
Point is simply that the eastern coyote is a variant of the western coyote or vice versa...there are some 19 subspecies across North America if I remember correctly...and each one has variations but are not unique species...and they are distinctly different from the red wolf even though they may share some DNA...
In the article it states that the black coloration came from interbreeding with dogs brought into this country by Native Americans yet it doesn’t occur out west? That’s what doesn’t add up. Then in the very next paragraph it states the timing of interbreeding with dogs can be dated to 50 years ago?. So, which is it? It doesn’t add up.
In the article it states that the black coloration came from interbreeding with dogs brought into this country by Native Americans yet it doesn’t occur out west? That’s what doesn’t add up. Then in the very next paragraph it states the timing of interbreeding with dogs can be dated to 50 years ago?. So, which is it? It doesn’t add up.
I am pretty sure this is a juvenile red wolf. Note his small size and red coloring. He is very agile as well. Should we call National Geographic ?
Red tailed hawk dressed as a coyote...I am pretty sure this is a juvenile red wolf. Note his small size and red coloring. He is very agile as well. Should we call National Geographic ?
One of the main problems, if not the biggest one, with the red woof reintroduction project at the ARNWR in eastern NC is that they are constantly breeding with coyotes. It has the potential to end it.Coyotes in GA are just a hybridized version of the same western coyote. In GA, they are 90% coyote, 5% wolf, and 5% dog...the wolf dog mating happened some 100 and 50 years ago respectively...
https://theconversation.com/yes-eastern-coyotes-are-hybrids-but-the-coywolf-is-not-a-thing-50368
There are something less than 50 known red wolves alive...and wolves, dogs, and coyotes are not interbreeding...they have no need to...
That may be...I was speaking more broadly...if the population is low, it would make sense...everything I've read for the most part is that the wolf reintroductions reduce the coyote populations and they don't interbreed i.e. Yellowstone...but I'm not up to speed on the red wolf reintroduction...One of the main problems, if not the biggest one, with the red woof reintroduction project at the ARNWR in eastern NC is that they are constantly breeding with coyotes. It has the potential to end it.
You should have seen the quick and dramatic change in the size and appearance and pitch of howls of coyotes around here after the red woof reintroduction in the Smokies.That may be...I was speaking more broadly...if the population is low, it would make sense...everything I've read for the most part is that the wolf reintroductions reduce the coyote populations and they don't interbreed i.e. Yellowstone...but I'm not up to speed on the red wolf reintroduction...
And full of misinformation.