josef2424
Member
I know that university researchers will disagree with me, but anyone think the constant low quail number talk is a little overhyped? I was hunting a 3,000 acre timber company lease around Waynesboro which was mainly loblolly pines in all stages of growth with a few hundred acres of clear cuts. Just driving a truck on the roads skirting around and going through the clearcuts, we were jumping a covey of 6-8 or so birds every half mile to mile driven it seemed. I was blown away. In Hancock we just cut 60 acres of pines that weren't thinned properly. Before then, I had jumped a covey twice in 20 years. Now i'm jumping one to two coveys a day by accident while just ambling around the clearcuts. Scares the crap out of me. It's a small data set, but the difference seems like night and day. If you look at satellite images of the land around lake Sinclair and Oconee, its full of pockets of clear cuts and new young pines. I think if more hunters were walking those clear cuts and chest high pines with dogs, there wouldn't be as much talk about the long lost good ol days. I think people just aren't wanting to get into the thick stuff and use their legs. I bet it was easier back in the day to cover more quail habitat when you could skirt around hedgerows instead of fighting your way into clearcut thickets. I'm sure when the pines grow tall enough to block the sun from hitting the ground, you might as well be hunting quail on mars. But to me it seems like in counties with a high amount of timber farming, the quail would not have to go far to get from one clearcut to the next. Also, I haven't heard these quail calling that much; and I know that's a main way researchers estimate population size. Maybe quail call less in this sort of habitat versus the classic savannah/hedgerow habitat or because more hawks are around these days. Maybe university researchers themselves don't get into this thicker growth as much. Anyone agree?