NoOne
Gone but not forgotten.
The Two Gospels, the Gospel of the Kingdom and the Gospel of the Grace of God
in Galatians(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles)
Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
IMO, that's what happens when men expect to find theological answers when asking only anthropological questions.I listened to about 6 minutes of the last vid posted.
It seems the case is being made that all except Paul (based loosely around Paul's refusal to be impressed by the mere stature and repute of men) had somehow "missed" that with which they had been entrusted.
Yet Paul also writes:
in Galatians
And in letters to the Corinthians does not seek to exceed either the message nor stature of Peter (nor even Apollos) when writing
and
It sounds rather (to me) cultish, elevating Paul to a stature he denied among the "other" apostles and workers.
Yep, and IMO that is what happens when men 2000+ years removed from the writings and 1500 years removed from the great councils, and do not study nor have a inkling of the language nor the true culture, believe they can open a modern translation and 100% of the time "Rightly divide".IMO, that's what happens when men expect to find theological answers when asking only anthropological questions.