.60 caliber buckshot
Senior Member
---------------------------------------------------------------the law requires “buckshot”
I never said it wouldn’t kill a deer
T F and BB are mentioned as waterfowl loads
This is another example of how technology gets ahead of the law as written
I’m just pointing out you might have an issue if you’re out there blasting away at a deer with what is listed as a waterfowl load
Same as a 410 slug will easily kill a deer now today but it’s not legal to shoot deer with —-but a .25 automatic is a legal deer caliber
I don't think so.
Consider:
Ammunition development is market and technology driven.
SAAMI standards are voluntary, even for SAAMI member companies.
The regulation simply says "Buckshot."
The composition and diameter of buckshot, along with buckshot shell design, has changed radically since the late 20th century. Encompassing buckshot pellets much larger and smaller within each gauge.
The regulation simply says "Slugs."
The composition, diameter and design of "slugs" has changed radically since the late 20th century. Encompasing slugs much larger and smaller within each gauge.
Last edited: