I remember the magazines coming out with pictures of a couple of does and a spike, and sometimes it would be a young buck and a doe with the question “Which one do you shoot”.Prior to QDMA everyone just went hunting, then they started with all this one to one ratio and supplemental feeding, herd management
I got it rite because the spike ran off.I remember the magazines coming out with pictures of a couple of does and a spike, and sometimes it would be young buck and a doe with the question “Which one do you shoot”. I always got it wrong cause they said the doe.
No that was just you getting busted before you found out about scent killI got it rite because the spike ran off.
Oh I get it now that was hypothetical
Eeerrrr that didn’t really happen.
Yes, politicians can really screw things up all in pursuit of a vote. I can see politicians should listen to their constituents but there are a few instances where decisions should not be made based entirely on what the people they represent are requesting.
All the people in the northern zone saying if the southern zone can bait then the northern half should be able to do it too. Well I disagree with the thinking the whole state should be allowed to bait. IMO the extreme north Georgia counties should be exclude from baiting...specifically counties such as Union, Towns, Fannin, Lumpkin, Gilmer, Rabun, etc. The deer population in the north Georgia mountains have been declining for a very long time. Baiting on public land will never be allowed but there is a lot of private land that adjoins the national forest/mountain WMA's. If baiting is allowed on private land, then that can very well be disastrous for a deer heard that is already struggling. The north Georgia mountains are unique in that most game depend on acorns in the fall / winter. In years where the is a mast failure, the people baiting on private land can very well decimate what very deer that are left.
For the sake of argument wouldn't food plots do the same if no food drives them to where the food is on private lands?
Yes, politicians can really screw things up all in pursuit of a vote. I can see politicians should listen to their constituents but there are a few instances where decisions should not be made based entirely on what the people they represent are requesting.
All the people in the northern zone saying if the southern zone can bait then the northern half should be able to do it too. Well I disagree with the thinking the whole state should be allowed to bait. IMO the extreme north Georgia counties should be excluded from baiting...specifically counties such as Union, Towns, Fannin, Lumpkin, Gilmer, Rabun, etc. The deer population in the north Georgia mountains have been declining for a very long time. Baiting on public land will never be allowed but there is a lot of private land that adjoins the national forest/mountain WMA's. If baiting is allowed on private land, then that can very well be disastrous for a deer heard that is already struggling. The north Georgia mountains are unique in that most game depend on acorns in the fall / winter. In years where the is a mast failure, the people baiting on private land can very well decimate what very few deer that are left.
Yes they could but due to the terrain you can't just plant a food plot anywhere. Also it takes more effort to establish a food plot as opposed to throwing some corn out. There are fields where you will see a lot of deer when food is scarce but those areas get limited hunting pressure from those that have access to hunt them. Legalizing baiting in the mountain counties will pretty much allow anyone to go buy a bag of corn throw it out and thus having a bigger impact in more remote areas away from fields/food plots.
Why make a place where baiting is by law illegal , a place where baiting will be declared legal?
Just because you put corn out doesn't mean you have to kill every deer that comes to it. If there are that few deer in that area perhaps you should be preaching trigger control.Yes, politicians can really screw things up all in pursuit of a vote. I can see politicians should listen to their constituents but there are a few instances where decisions should not be made based entirely on what the people they represent are requesting.
All the people in the northern zone saying if the southern zone can bait then the northern half should be able to do it too. Well I disagree with the thinking the whole state should be allowed to bait. IMO the extreme north Georgia counties should be excluded from baiting...specifically counties such as Union, Towns, Fannin, Lumpkin, Gilmer, Rabun, etc. The deer population in the north Georgia mountains have been declining for a very long time. Baiting on public land will never be allowed but there is a lot of private land that adjoins the national forest/mountain WMA's. If baiting is allowed on private land, then that can very well be disastrous for a deer heard that is already struggling. The north Georgia mountains are unique in that most game depend on acorns in the fall / winter. In years where the is a mast failure, the people baiting on private land can very well decimate what very few deer that are left.