sportsman94
Senior Member
I am trying to pick my location for a fall bear hunt this year. This will be my first bear hunt and I love to plan and research. Looking at harvest numbers throughout the years I see that certain WMAs have significantly higher harvest numbers than others historically. Now I realize some of these WMAs are larger than others, but I think if you broke it down to bear harvest per acre they would still be significantly higher than some of the other commonly talked about WMAs. In your opinion, do you think that the harvest numbers are so different because the populations are just that much higher on the high harvest WMAs? Do people mostly just choose to target deer on the other WMAs instead of bear? Are people (not on the bear forum) just lazy and dont want to kill/fool with a bear? The WMA with the most harvests seems to be extremely rugged in areas so it doesnt seem like that would necessarily be a reason when comparing to the other WMAs. Are most of the true bear killers just hunting NF and not spending a lot of time on the WMAs? Sorry for the questions, just trying to get a grasp of the different numbers so I can put myself in the best situation to have some success.
I have hunted turkeys in the far northwest corner of the state, but am super excited about getting to spend some time in bow season in the mountains.
Thanks for any help!
I have hunted turkeys in the far northwest corner of the state, but am super excited about getting to spend some time in bow season in the mountains.
Thanks for any help!