Ronnie T
Ol' Retired Mod
Today, in the church, in Christianity, can 1st cousins marry each other????
Today, in the church, in Christianity, can 1st cousins marry each other????
Today, in the church, in Christianity, can 1st cousins marry each other????
So, scripturally it was okay, but now it isn't?
Forbidden marriages.
Between mother and son. (Note that sexual relations between father and daughter are prohibited by Lev. 18:6 and 21:2-3) Leviticus 18:7-8
With stepchildren. Leviticus 18:8, 17
With an aunt. Leviticus 18:12-14
With sister or half-sister. Leviticus 18:9; Deut. 27:22
With half-sister and stepsisters. Leviticus 18:11
With daughter-in-law. Leviticus 18:15
With your sister-in-law. Leviticus 18:16
With your granddaughter. Leviticus 18:10
With your step-granddaughter. Leviticus 18:17
doesn't it just seem weird though??????
doesn't it just seem weird though??????
That is incest,and incest is sin.First it is against the law,in many States.There was a time in Scripture,where it was even the norm,to marry a sister,not any more.Since DNA has become more advanced in study.A person on your fathers side,who is very distantly related,can have a good part of your DNA make up.A 1st cousin is the next step below only a sibling.Mental retardation,early death,and many other physical conditions arise,from such a misguided union.There have even been many studies,where conditions are brought about by the union of 3rd and 4th cousins.I condemn such a union,and hate it for whoevers toes,that I may step on.It was needed in Scripture,for THE LORD's plan once.It is highly unaccepted,in areas of social standing,in a lot of areas of the norm now.Also in areas of Scripture,where the term brethren is used,in The New Testament,it is sometimes being used for cousin.I'm certain with as many members,as Woody's has,my comment is going to hit home for someone.Should I back down,for what I believe Scriptural?....I don't think so,incest is incest.
First off let me say I'm against marrying cousins or sisters and such, BUT at what point in the big scheme of life did it become wrong to do so? Adam and Eve had to have had sex with there kids and we all know many others in the Bible did the same. After the flood it had to happen again many times on down the line.
At what point did it start becoming wrong and these birth defects start happening?
That is incest,and incest is sin.First it is against the law,in many States.There was a time in Scripture,where it was even the norm,to marry a sister,not any more.Since DNA has become more advanced in study.A person on your fathers side,who is very distantly related,can have a good part of your DNA make up.A 1st cousin is the next step below only a sibling.Mental retardation,early death,and many other physical conditions arise,from such a misguided union.There have even been many studies,where conditions are brought about by the union of 3rd and 4th cousins.I condemn such a union,and hate it for whoevers toes,that I may step on.It was needed in Scripture,for THE LORD's plan once.It is highly unaccepted,in areas of social standing,in a lot of areas of the norm now.Also in areas of Scripture,where the term brethren is used,in The New Testament,it is sometimes being used for cousin.I'm certain with as many members,as Woody's has,my comment is going to hit home for someone.Should I back down,for what I believe Scriptural?....I don't think so,incest is incest.
Lowjack will have to help me on this one.I have heard in the languages of Scripture,that there was no word for nephew,niece,or cousin,so they were referred to as brethren or kinsman.All Scripture you have quoted is from The Old Testament.Why is this a significant issue?