lbzdually
Banned
A thread was started in the On Topic Forum, but I'd like to continue it here because the original question was basically answered. A fireman took offense to me saying that this law was being used as a money making tool. Let me clarify-I think the move over law should apply in certain situations. If a cop is sitting in the right shoulder with his lights on the side of I-285 in heavy traffic with no one pulled over and he pulls someone over for this law when there was no possible way for the person to move over, then it should not be a valid ticket. I witnessed it myself coming back from Florida.
I'll also say this, changing a tire on the side of I-75 at midnight with nothing more than a flashlight and emergency flashers going is just as dangerous if not more so than a police or fire truck sitting there, so the baloney idea that anyone who isn't a police of fireman or other emergency worker does not understand how dangerous being mere inches or feet away from traffic moving at 75+mph is.
That being said if a police officer can prove that person was purposefully not moving over and/or speeding in the lane next to the emergency worker, then that person deserves a ticket. Problem is, that the application of tis law is subjective. More than likely the officer is just going by what he thinks happened without having the full picture of what the driver could have done. And for this reason this law is being used as a catch-all fee-grabbing law since it pays out much more than a standard speeding ticket, with a $700 hit without less proof than a standard speeding ticket, and you have a recipe for abuse by law enforcement.
I'll also say this, changing a tire on the side of I-75 at midnight with nothing more than a flashlight and emergency flashers going is just as dangerous if not more so than a police or fire truck sitting there, so the baloney idea that anyone who isn't a police of fireman or other emergency worker does not understand how dangerous being mere inches or feet away from traffic moving at 75+mph is.
That being said if a police officer can prove that person was purposefully not moving over and/or speeding in the lane next to the emergency worker, then that person deserves a ticket. Problem is, that the application of tis law is subjective. More than likely the officer is just going by what he thinks happened without having the full picture of what the driver could have done. And for this reason this law is being used as a catch-all fee-grabbing law since it pays out much more than a standard speeding ticket, with a $700 hit without less proof than a standard speeding ticket, and you have a recipe for abuse by law enforcement.