Rezoning Proposal of Pine Log WMA

across the river

Senior Member
Its also of interest to note that one of the earliest accepted roles of limited government under english common law was management of the commons, or public land if you will. I sometimes find it interesting that people accept government funding and running of all sorts of things nowadays, but fight against that.

Good to know! I would hate to think that there was fellers on here that just stay tor up all day about every subject know ta man! Hurts my heart just to think about it.

Tore up, haha. If there is one thing in life I won't loose any sleep over it is this forum. The funny thing about people on here is they say something that just doesn't make any sense, even if in jest, and you respond and people want act like you are the "bad guy" because you didn't just go along with what they were saying, even if it is completely ridiculous. I try to live in reality and not just go along with stuff thought up in Lala land. So lets look at this logically, for real. 400 million for ~14,000 acres comes out to over $28,000 per acre. Based on its location, it was going to go for a lot regardless. Lets say they could get it for $20,000, $15,000 or even $10,000 and acre, it would still be asinine to buy it. You had 700 and some odd people hunt pine log, and less than 10% killed a deer. There isn't enough use, for anything DNR related, on that 14,000 acres worth that kind of money. If the state received a $500 million gift from some redneck billionaire to buy public hunting land in the state, it would still not make any sense to buy Pinelog. If it is all about "conservation" like people say, why would you spend hundreds of millions of dollars to buy "rough land" in the middle of development instead of buying 100,000 plus thousand acres across the state, much of it in areas far more conducive to wildlife and wildlife conservation. I get it is "sentimental" and all to a lot of people that hunted it growing up and all, but so was that 1500 acres I grew up hunting that is now a bunch of subdivisions and houses. Thats life. I don't care if it was going to be in my backyard, that is a dumb way to spend taxpayer money.
 

livinoutdoors

Goatherding Non-socialist Bohemian Luddite
Tore up, haha. If there is one thing in life I won't loose any sleep over it is this forum. The funny thing about people on here is they say something that just doesn't make any sense, even if in jest, and you respond and people want act like you are the "bad guy" because you didn't just go along with what they were saying, even if it is completely ridiculous. I try to live in reality and not just go along with stuff thought up in Lala land. So lets look at this logically, for real. 400 million for ~14,000 acres comes out to over $28,000 per acre. Based on its location, it was going to go for a lot regardless. Lets say they could get it for $20,000, $15,000 or even $10,000 and acre, it would still be asinine to buy it. You had 700 and some odd people hunt pine log, and less than 10% killed a deer. There isn't enough use, for anything DNR related, on that 14,000 acres worth that kind of money. If the state received a $500 million gift from some redneck billionaire to buy public hunting land in the state, it would still not make any sense to buy Pinelog. If it is all about "conservation" like people say, why would you spend hundreds of millions of dollars to buy "rough land" in the middle of development instead of buying 100,000 plus thousand acres across the state, much of it in areas far more conducive to wildlife and wildlife conservation. I get it is "sentimental" and all to a lot of people that hunted it growing up and all, but so was that 1500 acres I grew up hunting that is now a bunch of subdivisions and houses. Thats life. I don't care if it was going to be in my backyard, that is a dumb way to spend taxpayer money.
So i'll just put you down for a no on signin that petition. 10 4.
 

ucfireman

Senior Member
I signed it a while back.
I thought It was sold a bit back, just saw it hasn't.
I think the state should buy it, don't care what the no people have to say as they don't care what I have to say.
State already has my tax dollars, will get more, plus I gave 100.00 on my taxes to the Wildlife Conservation Fund.
 

Rebel's Dad

Senior Member
I signed it a while back.
I thought It was sold a bit back, just saw it hasn't.
I think the state should buy it, don't care what the no people have to say as they don't care what I have to say.
State already has my tax dollars, will get more, plus I gave 100.00 on my taxes to the Wildlife Conservation Fund.

I'm pretty sure Pittman-Robertson could be used to help fund this as well. It's the very sort of thing sportsman were thinking of when they created, lobbied for, and passed the act.
 

elfiii

Admin
Staff member

oldfatbubba

Senior Member
Have there been any recent developments on this? I caught the tail-end of a news item re: Pine Log on the radio yesterday but didn't catch the full story. I hope that it's good news.
 

frankwright

Senior Member
Not especially but not hopeless.
The owners would "like" some part of it to remain wild by selling to the state.

However there are 40 family members who are involved and I assume most will want the most money they can get regardless of what happens to the land!
 
Top