Artfuldodger
Senior Member
If the Confederate Generals had respect for William T. Sherman, how do ya'll feel about the man? I was taught to hate and despise the man growing up as with all Yankees. I realize now that's a foolish way to be taught as I am now back in the Union. My state, i've always been in the Union.
General Joe Johnston respected the man. I guess what I'm looking for is was he doing what he thought was correct for his cause?
“Total war”, or “hard war” as Sherman called it, was a strategy to destroy all objects of military value to the enemy. In doing so, Sherman hoped to cut off its access to resources, and strangle the enemy into submission. Even from the start of the war the Confederate army was ill equipped, but the destruction of the limited resources still available was a terrible blow. These tactics created resentment in the Southern people which remained long after the war was over. To his credit, Sherman was preoccupied with the care of those civilians in the area of combat. After the capture of Atlanta, he ordered all civilians to leave the city, as he knew that they would be in greater danger within it, than outside of it. Sherman burned the resources critical to the enemy’s war effort within the city according to his total war policy. However, this fire spread throughout the city and created wide spread damage. If Sherman hadn’t ordered the residents out of the city, who knows what the death toll would have been.
I've read some terrible accounts from his march to the sea. I've read some terrible accounts from all wars. We take more consideration of civilians now than even in WWII. It seemed to change after that war. Getting back to Sherman, was he a monster or was he even a good general? Was he just following orders?
General Joe Johnston respected the man. I guess what I'm looking for is was he doing what he thought was correct for his cause?
“Total war”, or “hard war” as Sherman called it, was a strategy to destroy all objects of military value to the enemy. In doing so, Sherman hoped to cut off its access to resources, and strangle the enemy into submission. Even from the start of the war the Confederate army was ill equipped, but the destruction of the limited resources still available was a terrible blow. These tactics created resentment in the Southern people which remained long after the war was over. To his credit, Sherman was preoccupied with the care of those civilians in the area of combat. After the capture of Atlanta, he ordered all civilians to leave the city, as he knew that they would be in greater danger within it, than outside of it. Sherman burned the resources critical to the enemy’s war effort within the city according to his total war policy. However, this fire spread throughout the city and created wide spread damage. If Sherman hadn’t ordered the residents out of the city, who knows what the death toll would have been.
I've read some terrible accounts from his march to the sea. I've read some terrible accounts from all wars. We take more consideration of civilians now than even in WWII. It seemed to change after that war. Getting back to Sherman, was he a monster or was he even a good general? Was he just following orders?