SemperFiDawg
Political Forum Arbiter of Truth (And Lies Too)
Sargent clearly pointed out that your assertion in the OP was wrong.
Sargent clearly pointed out that your assertion in the OP was wrong.
LOL, I had to google this, there is a difference. LOL, I learn something everyday. Yesterday it was that a cedar tree on a hedge row is no good. The good cedar wood comes from a cedar tree under the canopy of surrounding big woods.Do you mean gender or sex?
Do you mean gender or sex?
And yet somehow the conversation continues.
Centerpin mentions another early Bible version of Mark that does not mention it and neither do other of the earliest versions of Mark.
As I research more I am finding that Sinaiticus has been added to, subtracted from, edited and had replacements of passages. The ultraviolet testing has revealed passages that have been erased as traces of the original ink still remain but it still does not say ,with so many editors doing revisions, when that ink was inserted and when that ink was erased. Being that the same text is not present in other early versions of Mark is it quite possible it was added in Sinaiticus later and then removed as a correction again after another editors revision.
I will continue to try to research other of the earliest versions of Mark and see where it leads.
There is no such thing as transgender. Just confused people not praying enough.
All of this could have been avoided if God would have wrote the book. Hard to find good help.
Agreed.
I found this site while checking around:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm
Now I am going to have to check into MORE stuff.
Good one Griz.
A LOT of house cleaning went on in the early church and many texts were purposely destroyed, changed, added to etc.
I am trying to research the reasoning behind why ancient texts were ordered to be treated in such manners..
Yes and Matthew and Luke copied from Mark. Not a very accurate way of recording anything. Leaves lots of room for embellishmentsIsn't that the truth.
Mark, who was the first to write a Gospel, did not witness any of it as he wrote down what Peter told him.
Not a very accurate way of getting details right.
Yes and Matthew and Luke copied from Mark. Not a very accurate way of recording anything. Leaves lots of room for embellishments
No but signs do exist that it was late enough that Jewish ways were no longer remembered. An example is that Jewish lingo was that they sometimes repeat things, Like "riding on a wave, a big wave". The text says Jesus came riding on a donkey the foal of a donkey. So Matthew not knowing this Jewish meaning has Jesus riding on both. Our translations have covered it up but the greek says that he came riding on "them".Indeed.
Have you looked into Matthew and Luke being written much later than claimed and under orders from the early church in order to tell more details?