Rebel Yell
Banned
I challenge everyone on this site to actually look at the evidence released concerning the investigation of Jameis Winston. AFTER you look at the actual evidence, please show me where the cover up occurred and why we should believe any of the numerous stories that the accuser has told.
It’s pretty straight forward, the accuser came up with three explanations for the night that did not involve her being lucid: 1) hit on the head; 2) drunk; 3) drugged. However, there was no physical evidence of #1 and no toxicology evidence for #2 and #3. Even worse, the accuser repeatedly claimed she was drunk while her attorney sternly denied that she was. On the basis of that along I am stunned that the accuser still has apologists claiming that the process did not work. This doesn’t even include the less substantial variations in the accuser’s story and memory. If you add that to the fact to the two sworn affidavits (which means those two were willing to go to jail if the physical/toxicology evidence had contradicted their story) it is painfully self evident that this case should not go to trial and that Winston should be presumed innocent both in the court system and in the court of public opinion.
If you have a valid reason for still believing that Winston is guilty, please post it. If you're just gonna throw poo against the wall to hope something sticks, just let it go.
It’s pretty straight forward, the accuser came up with three explanations for the night that did not involve her being lucid: 1) hit on the head; 2) drunk; 3) drugged. However, there was no physical evidence of #1 and no toxicology evidence for #2 and #3. Even worse, the accuser repeatedly claimed she was drunk while her attorney sternly denied that she was. On the basis of that along I am stunned that the accuser still has apologists claiming that the process did not work. This doesn’t even include the less substantial variations in the accuser’s story and memory. If you add that to the fact to the two sworn affidavits (which means those two were willing to go to jail if the physical/toxicology evidence had contradicted their story) it is painfully self evident that this case should not go to trial and that Winston should be presumed innocent both in the court system and in the court of public opinion.
If you have a valid reason for still believing that Winston is guilty, please post it. If you're just gonna throw poo against the wall to hope something sticks, just let it go.