bullethead
Of the hard cast variety
That's your opinion.
You are incapable of knowing the difference between definition and opinion, how can we accept your knowledge of anything else?
That's your opinion.
With the exception of the killing folks part, why are the other things you mentioned so bad?
Welder I want you to explain to me in detail about Who investigated these 500 witnesses, where it was recorded, and what their testimony said.If there were 500+ eyewitnesses that came forth and said they saw a mermaid off the coast of Florida, you would want to find out how all 500 saw the exact same thing and testified the same thing.
But yet there were 500+ eyewitnesses of Jesus' resurrection. You reject that testimony. Don't you think they investigated the testimonies in that day with scrutiny over such a miraculous claim? You know they did.
How do you know you're helping and not actually hurting?
If you say you're open to the existence of unicorns, but then turn around and constantly discredit the possibility they exist to a believer in unicorns, how is that helping?
Sounds to me that you're talking out both sides of your mouth.
OYG,
you are stuck in the same debunked rut and instead of taking the help you are given you just floor the accelerator digging yourself deeper.
NOWHERE except the bible are any of those witnesses mentioned.
NOBODY outside of the bible mentioned it. It is recorded NOWHERE else in Jewish or Roman history.
Yes welder they did investigate miraculous claims.
They did not invesigate 500 witnesses to a resurrection because no resurrection took place.
Your argument of ignorance is only surpassed by your willingness of ignorance.
You keep bringing up the very things you have been shown are incorrect over and over and over. It is borderline insanity.
Bullet why are you so quick not to believe eye witness testimony? Both in the Bible and by millions of Christians today. It is admissible evidence in any court to determine the truth of what happened. Yet you don't even consider their testimony to be true. This is the main thing I don't understand about your position.
Bullet why are you so quick not to believe eye witness testimony? Both in the Bible and by millions of Christians today. It is admissible evidence in any court to determine the truth of what happened. Yet you don't even consider their testimony to be true. This is the main thing I don't understand about your position.
By your standards Elvis is still alive.Bullet why are you so quick not to believe eye witness testimony? Both in the Bible and by millions of Christians today. It is admissible evidence in any court to determine the truth of what happened. Yet you don't even consider their testimony to be true. This is the main thing I don't understand about your position.
Name one court that accepts any of that as proof that a god exists.
By your standards Elvis is still alive.
Why hasn't the courts announced that Elvis is pulling a fast one on the public and has faked his own death?
Name one court that accepts any of that as proof that a god exists.
Let me give you an example. When I get back to deer camp the boys say did you see anything? If I tell them I saw a big eight point you better believe they will hunt my stand. When I go out fishing they ask did you catch anything? I tell them I located a school of stripers busting the surface and give them the location they will go fish there. Even though they did not witness these things themselves. They believe me why would I lie. Is it just a trust issue with you or what? I'm not saying there are not people out there that make things up. But so many eyewitness's with the same accounts come on.
Do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God? With your right hand on the Bible.
If I may, the testimonies I have heard from "millions of Christians today" are no more compelling than the testimonies of UFO abductees or people who have seen ghosts. I'm more compelled by testimonies that relate a supernatural occurrence involving physical matter: An object like a car passing through another object undamaged (video would be excellent), Stigmata, or recordings of demonic possession; something real, not merely "I got a felling" or "I heard a voice".
Even then, almost all of such evidence points to a hoax or
a misunderstanding of what actually happened.
And to the question that you and Welder avoid: What to make of the testimony of those that have had experiences and give testimony that they claim points to a God different than yours? Can we stay on that issue for at least 15 posts?
I have answered this question before. If I saw a ufo I would have said that if I saw a unicorn I would have said that. I only have reference to what I have witnessed and experienced.
Do the same guys flock to your stand when you tell them that a gaggle of bigfeets use the trail nearby?Let me give you an example. When I get back to deer camp the boys say did you see anything? If I tell them I saw a big eight point you better believe they will hunt my stand. When I go out fishing they ask did you catch anything? I tell them I located a school of stripers busting the surface and give them the location they will go fish there. Even though they did not witness these things themselves. They believe me why would I lie. Is it just a trust issue with you or what? I'm not saying there are not people out there that make things up. But so many eyewitness's with the same accounts come on.
I have answered this question before. If I saw a ufo I would have said that if I saw a unicorn I would have said that. I only have reference to what I have witnessed and experienced.
So do you believe them like I should believe you?