Swamprat
Swamprat
200 yard rule was done away with in South Georgia in 2011.
according to the 572 discussion's and the 365,834 replies on what is causing the decline of turkey populations , your opinion is very seldom considered....My arm chair opinion is that disease is the issue….
It`s interesting to me how so many ( erstwhile turkey population biologists apparently) , think Dr. Chamberlain`s ( and Turkey`s for Tomorrow ,and, I suppose, the joint research with Kentucky) research should be pointed in a dozen different directions than they are, and critical of the methods in which he and his teams pursue information and data. He`s an easy target because he`s recognized nationally by scientific and conservation organizations as an authority in the area of wild turkey biology and population dynamics. IMHO, those that believe his recommendations ( and that`s all they are, he has no authority to enact any regulations ) are based SOLELY on his own personal opinions don`t know much about scientific research or scientific method. For those who think he should take the time and effort to go into great public detail to intimately explain each and every nuance of his, and others, research, down to individual data points, he doesn`t have the time nor is he obligated to do so. He and his teams are too busy in the field at least TRYING to find some answers. I don`t know ( nor does anyone else on this forum, for that matter) where the break through information will come from. As an avid turkey hunter himself, he has the same stake as the rest of us in finding possible solutions to whatever is adversely impacting turkey populations. I`m personally glad he and others are out there trying. I`m fully aware that my personal views on this are in the vast minority of those on this forum. Dr. Chamberlain is apparently the sole villain in this saga, at least according to posters here. I just don`t see him in that light.I agree. He (Turkey doc.) Seems to be more interested in spending money on devices to record gobbles than finding out what percentage of Jake's can breed or what percentage of 1st year hens lay. Peak gobbling shifts every year depending on weather by a few days or so and provides no information on why the population has declined. Pull his funding and give it to someone who will do the job!
I harvested what I believe to be a satellite gobbler yesterday. Had strands 11" on beard but generally 10.5. I'd Guess 3 yrs old...he fit perfect into what this study is addressing. My initial sighting at about 100 yrds, he was in full strut and reacting to calling and 2 hen decs with a white head half strut jake. When he had cut the distance in half, I started hearing a gobbling tom back in the swamp. He would gobble to my calling but the tom coming never said a word. In fact he never gobbled. He brushed the jake decoy but didn't get further aggresive. He also had led a single hen into the decoy set. He never broke full strut the entire time I watched him, and never uttered a turkey sound. Eventually, I had to shoot him in full strut at 12 yrds. The other tom was still gobbling repeatedly, back down in the swamp but closing ground. They were within 150-200 yrds of each other the entire duration. He "could" have bred that hen and the loud mouth, I assume the dominant, would have never known.Here is the survey questions that get answered for every turkey submitted into the auburn university fertility study. They sent me a paper copy in my packet of stuff this year, but the people who bring me birds and myself use an online survey with the same questions. View attachment 1217168View attachment 1217169View attachment 1217170
It`s interesting to me how so many ( erstwhile turkey population biologists apparently) , think Dr. Chamberlain`s ( and Turkey`s for Tomorrow ,and, I suppose, the joint research with Kentucky) research should be pointed in a dozen different directions than they are, and critical of the methods in which he and his teams pursue information and data. He`s an easy target because he`s recognized nationally by scientific and conservation organizations as an authority in the area of wild turkey biology and population dynamics. IMHO, those that believe his recommendations ( and that`s all they are, he has no authority to enact any regulations ) are based SOLELY on his own personal opinions don`t know much about scientific research or scientific method. For those who think he should take the time and effort to go into great public detail to intimately explain each and every nuance of his, and others, research, down to individual data points, he doesn`t have the time nor is he obligated to do so. He and his teams are too busy in the field at least TRYING to find some answers. I don`t know ( nor does anyone else on this forum, for that matter) where the break through information will come from. As an avid turkey hunter himself, he has the same stake as the rest of us in finding possible solutions to whatever is adversely impacting turkey populations. I`m personally glad he and others are out there trying. I`m fully aware that my personal views on this are in the vast minority of those on this forum. Dr. Chamberlain is apparently the sole villain in this saga, at least according to posters here. I just don`t see him in that light.
Flame away!!
If nothing else, this all has been amusing. When politicians insert themselves into matters of conservation, wildlife management and other issues impacting hunting, we hunters p_ s_ and moan and say " Decisions should be made based upon science and input from the professional biologists ". That`s apparently all well and good as long as the professional biologists don`t 1. Say anything that we disagree with or doesn`t match preconceived notions formed as a result of non-scientific and/or anecdotal observations or 2. ( and far worse ) advocate for or propose something that inconveniences us in some way. Like a shortened turkey season. Really, it all depends on whose ox is getting gored, doesn`t it?
I agree with you also on this. I’m glad that it’s an issue that’s being noticed so that people and the NWTF and TFT are at least trying to do something about it. I have listened to Dr.C and agree with most of what he says. I don’t see him as the villain in all of this. But the guys that get on social media and proclaim that habitat mangement is the only answer and bash people who want to trap nest predators is where I think the divide starting to grow. But this is all just my .02 cents worth.It`s interesting to me how so many ( erstwhile turkey population biologists apparently) , think Dr. Chamberlain`s ( and Turkey`s for Tomorrow ,and, I suppose, the joint research with Kentucky) research should be pointed in a dozen different directions than they are, and critical of the methods in which he and his teams pursue information and data. He`s an easy target because he`s recognized nationally by scientific and conservation organizations as an authority in the area of wild turkey biology and population dynamics. IMHO, those that believe his recommendations ( and that`s all they are, he has no authority to enact any regulations ) are based SOLELY on his own personal opinions don`t know much about scientific research or scientific method. For those who think he should take the time and effort to go into great public detail to intimately explain each and every nuance of his, and others, research, down to individual data points, he doesn`t have the time nor is he obligated to do so. He and his teams are too busy in the field at least TRYING to find some answers. I don`t know ( nor does anyone else on this forum, for that matter) where the break through information will come from. As an avid turkey hunter himself, he has the same stake as the rest of us in finding possible solutions to whatever is adversely impacting turkey populations. I`m personally glad he and others are out there trying. I`m fully aware that my personal views on this are in the vast minority of those on this forum. Dr. Chamberlain is apparently the sole villain in this saga, at least according to posters here. I just don`t see him in that light.
Flame away!!
I believe that we all should be somewhat skeptical when the government is handling out our money. It is our money. I stand by what I said about recording gobbles means nothing. The devices are very expensive and the time spent on going through all of it would be better spent on something else. If you can think of any correlation between the two please let me know. If we are paying for research on decline of the population the research being conducted should be meaningful. The amount of gobbling is contingent.It`s interesting to me how so many ( erstwhile turkey population biologists apparently) , think Dr. Chamberlain`s ( and Turkey`s for Tomorrow ,and, I suppose, the joint research with Kentucky) research should be pointed in a dozen different directions than they are, and critical of the methods in which he and his teams pursue information and data. He`s an easy target because he`s recognized nationally by scientific and conservation organizations as an authority in the area of wild turkey biology and population dynamics. IMHO, those that believe his recommendations ( and that`s all they are, he has no authority to enact any regulations ) are based SOLELY on his own personal opinions don`t know much about scientific research or scientific method. For those who think he should take the time and effort to go into great public detail to intimately explain each and every nuance of his, and others, research, down to individual data points, he doesn`t have the time nor is he obligated to do so. He and his teams are too busy in the field at least TRYING to find some answers. I don`t know ( nor does anyone else on this forum, for that matter) where the break through information will come from. As an avid turkey hunter himself, he has the same stake as the rest of us in finding possible solutions to whatever is adversely impacting turkey populations. I`m personally glad he and others are out there trying. I`m fully aware that my personal views on this are in the vast minority of those on this forum. Dr. Chamberlain is apparently the sole villain in this saga, at least according to posters here. I just don`t see him in that light.
Flame away!!
I believe that we all should be somewhat skeptical when the government is handling out our money. It is our money. I stand by what I said about recording gobbles means nothing. The devices are very expensive and the time spent on going through all of it would be better spent on something else. If you can think of any correlation between the two please let me know. If we are paying for research on decline of the population the research being conducted should be meaningful. The amount of gobbling is contingent.
I think I listened to the same one. I believe that it my have some impact but that does seem like a large area. The toxins are pretty concerning to me because I still think that a virus or some sickness is too blame mostly for the decline. If we are dumping a ton of corn out and driving their immune system down making it harder to beat especially young turkeys. On the other hand I don't know a lot of people that feed corn all year or in the spring. I hunt deep in some WMA areas that don't have birds as they used to that are very very far from homes and private property. For me that makes it hard to point my finger at just the corn but I also can see how it could hurt some properties. I know this isn't well written just babbling...After spending days of my life listening and reading about these scientific studies, some of the designs and parameters of these experiments are pretty goofy. One the other day listed a 60 acre area around each established feeder with inflated or complete nest loss due to predation on artificial nest sets, presumably due to the presence of the feeder. I’m sorry, but the feeder isn’t having an impact that big. A hen may be in trouble if she laid a clutch ten feet from a feeder, but 300 plus yards? It makes me highly doubt the ability of the technicians to place eggs as a hen turkey would. I think I’ll do my own artificial clutch surveys and post the results here.
If it doesn`t get eaten REALLY quickly in our relatively warm, moist environment....bad news. I`ve personally seen in the laboratory what aflatoxin and rubratoxin can do to animals...particularly their livers.I think I listened to the same one. I believe that it my have some impact but that does seem like a large area. The toxins are pretty concerning to me because I still think that a virus or some sickness is too blame mostly for the decline. If we are dumping a ton of corn out and driving their immune system down making it harder to beat especially young turkeys. On the other hand I don't know a lot of people that feed corn all year or in the spring. I hunt deep in some WMA areas that don't have birds as they used to that are very very far from homes and private property. For me that makes it hard to point my finger at just the corn but I also can see how it could hurt some properties. I know this isn't well written just babbling...
If it doesn`t get eaten REALLY quickly in our relatively warm, moist environment....bad news. I`ve personally seen in the laboratory what aflatoxin and rubratoxin can do to animals...particularly their livers.