ASH556
Senior Member
My understanding is that most would consider does more prevalent and easier to kill than bucks. I'm not sure if it's something about the way I hunt or the properties I hunt, but I see way more bucks than does. I killed my first deer in 2002 and it was a doe as was my second deer in 2003. Some years I killed no deer and some years I killed multiple, but as of today, I've killed 24 deer total consisting of 9 does and 15 bucks. Some of the bucks I've killed were nice bucks and I was pleased to take them. Others were killed out of desparation to get some meat. Thus far this year over about 5 or 6 hunts, I've seen 8 deer from the stand, only 3 of which were does. I hunt NE GA in the foothills and hunt terrain features combined with water sources in hardwoods. There are no hay or ag fields on any of the properties I hunt. Even on camera I have more bucks than does. I rarely see multiple deer per sit and don't have the large doe groups that others seem to have.
Do you think this is more a function of the properties I hunt, or how I hunt (the areas I choose?) If there are things I could change to specifically target does moreso, I'd like to do that to increase my meat acquisition. I prefer to bow hunt too for what it's worth.
Do you think this is more a function of the properties I hunt, or how I hunt (the areas I choose?) If there are things I could change to specifically target does moreso, I'd like to do that to increase my meat acquisition. I prefer to bow hunt too for what it's worth.
Last edited: