Spotlite
Resident Homesteader
Even with facts / proof / evidence a jury / judge still has to determine if it’s convincing to them or not. We don’t always agree with their verdict, especially if it’s not how we thought / wanted it to be. That didn’t make the crime false or inaccurate.I agree with your point.
But you have to go deeper.
Many times perception is guided by what we WANT to hear. What we WANT to be true. The story that we WANT to be told. The story that supports our side/agenda.
Different perceptions can be a "honest" difference.
Different perceptions can also be "dishonest" differences in that facts and evidence get shoved to the side and ones agenda becomes the controlling factor.
The only way to avoid/minimize the "perception" issue is to rely on evidence, facts and proof.
Last edited: