HavocLover
Senior Member
Y’all are talking like processors are Fortune 500 companies. They’re all mom and pop outfits… having a “database” isn’t realistic. You can’t sit there at the door and screen every single customer and make sure they aren’t on the “naughty list.” You’d either be taking precious time away from yourself while you could be doing something more productive, or worse, be creating a whole other job and adding another employee… just cause a few slackers left them holding the bill?
Also, making everyone pay up front would likely run off more customers than the non paying ones that you’re trying to compensate for by implementing that policy.
While I don’t agree with it whatsoever… I’d venture to say the processors likely aren’t super hard up about the non-payers. I bet they still make a good bit of that back with non-hunters.
In addition to all of that… there’s not a business in this world where you don’t have to eat some capital somewhere along the lines… no different here.
Also, making everyone pay up front would likely run off more customers than the non paying ones that you’re trying to compensate for by implementing that policy.
While I don’t agree with it whatsoever… I’d venture to say the processors likely aren’t super hard up about the non-payers. I bet they still make a good bit of that back with non-hunters.
In addition to all of that… there’s not a business in this world where you don’t have to eat some capital somewhere along the lines… no different here.