rayjay
Senior Member
I once let a guy shoot some 7mm/08 reloads over my chrono. They were going 2400 which is way less than what he thought. That will make a HECK of a difference at longer ranges.
Also, if 4" is all you can do at 100 then that's about as far as you should shoot at game.
It's not as simple as making a ballistic calculation to hit at longer range. You have to practice at longer range. North and South Point of impacts don't play a major role at longer distances, but East and West points of impact make a tremendous difference. It's also not as simple thinking that you are hitting one inch off at 9 o'clock equating to two off at 200
It also gives you confidence in your shot which is one of the most comforting and calming things to have with you when you decide to shoot a live target.
I once let a guy shoot some 7mm/08 reloads over my chrono. They were going 2400 which is way less than what he thought. That will make a HECK of a difference at longer ranges.
I am not following your north and south, east and west points of impact...are you talking about wind and not really POI?
When you get far enough from the muzzle, the rotation of the earth does have an impact on where your bullet will land!
I like what Briar Patch said, my experience is very similar. One variable that should be strongly considered is time of flight. Game animals move. The kill zone may have moved significantly during the time it takes for a bullet to get there.
My limit is 400 yards, for this reason alone.
If you are shooting 1" groups at 100yds you are good to go to 300/350. Smaller groups, even better.
.
Yes, agreed. Well within an acceptable group for a whitetail.If you are shooting 1" groups at 100 and are consistent... your group error at 300 will be 3"
Some of us are lucky enough to own or have access to long range shooting opportunities on a daily or common, practical basis. Others are lucky enough just to have access at 100. Some less fortunate have access to even shorter, 25 yards.
Given the circumstances, is it ever enough to train at shorter distances to hone trigger and breath control and then rely on theoretical ballistics and wind calculations to reliably and accurately hit your target at long range? Or, should you only hunt long range when you have consistent access and opportunity to shoot at actual long ranges?
Let's consider anything above 300 yards as long ranged.
I'll argue that practicing at shorter ranges coupled with experience in drop and wind calculations is better than practicing long. You can practice long all you want, but conditions will often change even in the same shooting session.
Obligatory that my opinion comes from someone with absolutely zero experience in shooting over 300 yards, but I don't think it's unreasonable to hunt longer ranges if a shooter understands the math behind making a shot. All of this comes from my gastrointestinal track.
Thoughts?
I'm thinking you are either trolling now or you are having some serious difficulties with understanding.
I was making a joke against the 3" margin at 300 yards.So how did you come to understand from all this that it was the deer's fault? I don't get it. I have been told that I am pretty dense.