OK, so a belief in God was enough.
Pretty sure he meant the "yes" for both.
OK, so a belief in God was enough.
I'm 100% sure Christ preached through Noah but 1 Peter 3:18-19 says "He was put to death in the body, but made alive in the spirit, in which He also went and preached to the spirits in prison."
Christ was made alive in the spirit. Then he went and preached. The only mention of Noah was about who the group in prison was, not who was doing the preaching.
There is a mystery associated to who this group was. Perhaps a group of the Elect or fallen angels. Maybe the preaching was not for salvation but judging. Salvation offered after physical death perhaps. Who knows, it is a mystery.
If it was Noah, was he now preaching to the group in prison who were once living on the earth when he was who were at the time of Christ's death spirits?
Who was Christ through Noah preaching to? Christ was physically dead and alive spiritually. Through Noah his spirit preached to those spirits that were alive when Noah was. What was the purpose of this preaching?
Was it the human spirit of the man Jesus or the divine spirit of the pre-existing 1/3 of the Trinity that was preaching through Noah?
With your insertion of "then" you create a chronology that is not in the scripture. The verb is best translated "having gone" (definitely a prior event...chronologically that is). Rather than write more I will recommend Dr. Gill.
I think adding the (ed) to the verb preach also made it a past tense. Which we all agree the event was past at the time this was written.
1peter 3:19 Aramaic Bible in Plain English
And he preached to those souls who were held in Sheol,
"He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit."
"after being put to death in the fleshly realm but made alive in the spiritual realm."
"After being made alive, he went"
"By which also he went"
"In that state He also went"
There is a chronology in this scripture. Jesus died a physical death and made alive in the spirit. In that state, which is now a spirit, he went.
The order is there. He is no longer alive as a physical man. He is alive in spirit form only. He went in that state. He is still in "time." The time from his physical death to his resurrection is around three days.
It was his spirit that went and not the Spirit that went. It was the 100% man part of his entity that went. It had to be "He was put to death in the body, but made alive in the spirit."
So he went or in which he went. In that state he also went.
In that time he went.
Who?
You really need to add to your library...
True, but translations of Aramaic NT isn't likely to make the list soon.
The evidence of God and His creation is evident in everything we see. Jesus Christ died on the cross in order to give us a path to forgiveness that we sure don't deserve.
The word of God says it, I believe it, end of story for me!
I made it to here. I can't keep reading the next 3 pages of debate. You tagged it here. Some do believe that scripture in a way confirms that seeing Gods creation exposes one to God and there maybe some kind of unspoken grace there for people who never hear the name of Jesus. This whole notion of God being fair is funny. Is he fair by our standards or by his standards? Everyone wants to put God in a little box that they can understand. I tried that too before I accepted Christ by creating my own God. Then after I was saved I wanted to figure out the Trinity, election, and why a fair God would condemn someone who never heard of Jesus. The answer is simple. Both election and free will can be true and I don't have to understand God and his ways. People who never heard of Christ could go to H e l l. I can have salvation though! God was brutal in the Old Testament. We don't live in old Testament times. It's still the same God though. While God has not changed we have Jesus who saved us from the wrath of God. If Jesus is not the only way the he died for nothing! Do you believe your a good person? While yall bank on that getting you in to heaven I think I'll go with the Jesus!
I don't know what scripture it is. My Pastor talk about it. The biggest question he gets is "Do people that never hear the name of Jesus go to H e l l. Some scripture points to knowing God through seeing his creation etc. It's pretty clear though that they unfortunately do go to H e l l. That's why we are called to go to the end of the earth to tell everyone about Jesus . But just because I don't completely understand doesn't mean God doesn't have that figured out already.
I don't know what scripture it is. My Pastor talk about it. The biggest question he gets is "Do people that never hear the name of Jesus go to H e l l. Some scripture points to knowing God through seeing his creation etc. It's pretty clear though that they unfortunately do go to H e l l. That's why we are called to go to the end of the earth to tell everyone about Jesus . But just because I don't completely understand doesn't mean God doesn't have that figured out already.
Waking this old thread:
In the spirit of philosophical theological debate and not with the intent to offend anyone, I respectfully disagree.
Jesus is the only way to people that believe Jesus is the only way.
Here is what I mean: Christians believe Jesus is the way to salvation because this is what their "divine" or "divinely-inspired" writings tell them. This concept of course reinforces the community's belief in Christianity. While many people in this thread and elsewhere proclaim that they "know" this to be true, it is only true because they choose to believe so because of the scriptures and those before them that claim to "know." The reality is that no one really "knows" unless he/she has communicated with or experienced the divine. It is a concept accepted by "faith" in the community from which it originated.
In contrast, other religions throughout the world do not share in this belief because members of these communities have different experiences, perspectives, and writings that convince them otherwise. In the eyes of many of these people, the Christian way of thinking about salvation is wrong.
In essence, you have multiple groups of people declaring their beliefs about the world and the afterworld are superior to others because their writings tell them so.
Who is correct? What is the actual answer to original question of the thread?
...Only God knows.
Metaphorically speaking, I believe God is like a diamond. Every religion or belief system in the world is trying see and understand the "brilliance" and "sparkle" of what we call God. While we quibble about what this is, we often fail to see that we are all looking at the same thing. However, like a diamond in the light, when we look at God from different angles, this brilliance looks differently to different people. No matter what anyone may profess or claim to know in this earthly realm, this is a truth.
Consequently, I have a hard time believing that "Satan's den" is in the cards for the many exceptionally good people of other faiths - such as the Dalai Lama, Ghandi, etc. - that have and are practicing the positive principles that are universally accepted as "good." They were/are the way they were/are because this is how they see "the light." Are all of these people wrong? Only God knows the answer.
Thus, it seems to me, if I want to hedge my salvational bet, it would be wise to focus on right thought and good works throughout my life. This is to me faith in action. It brings inner peace in this life; whereas, the alternative sows discord and discontent. Whether or not this does me any good after I leave this earthly realm, I do not know. In the end, God will decide.