across the river
Senior Member
They must be some real awesome turkeys hunters out there,the gobbler that has the hens does not have to gobble he already has the hens the gobblers you kill early in the season are the ones he ran off,and then when the other hens go on the nest is when he is easier to kill.
Dude, slow down. I don't set the regulations. I am simply trying to explain to you the rational behind why they are doing it. Studies 40 plus years ago showed gobbling really takes off in late March as gobblers start trying to attract hens. It falls off some as they get henned up in April. By late April most hens are on the nest, and gobbling picks up again as they look for new mates. This isn't new info nor rocket science. Seasons were originally opened in late March in Southern states to correspond to the peak gobbling activity for hunters, but since habitat overall was great, the earlier opener didn't have a ton of impact and populations continued to grow. Populations have steadily declined in the last 20 years or so, in large part due to habitat changes. In the last 10 years GPS studies have allowed them to study turkey movement in an effort to try to understand and fight the decline. They have found that early hunting pressure can impact turkey behavior and negatively impact the time at which hens nest for the worse, which impacts poults recruitment. This is especially true in areas where harvest and pressure is high, i.e. public land. Studies have also shown there is a higher accidental kill of hens in the early season when they are still on their feet than there is when hens are on the nest, which is more of a problem in high pressure areas, i.e. public land. The only hand the DNR really has to play is the harvest limit and season dates. The "goal' is to push out hunting and the harvest of gobblers out past the time at which the majority of hens are already on the nest. In theory, if the hens are already breed and on the nest before the hunting season starts, then hunting has way less impact on nesting and recruitment and the incidental kill rate of hens is also reduced. This is why the survey recently went out to find out what "changes" people preferred, but the goal is still the same, which is to limit hunting and harvest before hens are on the nest.
If a person has private land with good habitat and little pressure, then moving the season back doesn't have much impact, because the pressure isn't really there to begin with. Do you get that? It essentially functions like a tract with no pressure. If a public land tract has tons of pressure, then moving the season to allow the hens there to nest as they would on a low pressure or unhinged tract into April would have an impact, at least in theory. As far as national forest go, I would assume the change would impact all public land, or you are correct in your assessment that they would get hit harder. The DNR changed the deer season on certain national forests, so it would make no sense to do it on one and not the other.
What I am trying to explain to you though, is there is a good reason to change the season dates on WMA's, even if they don't do it on private land. They is plenty of research out there on this, and I'm not just making this stuff up off the top of my head. The DNR has limited options ad they are doing what they can do based on what they know and the research that has been done. Do I think it will really help, maybe, maybe not. But I know for a fact that trying to limit hunting pressure in March and early April on a tract that doesn't really get much in the way of pressure anyway will have way less impact than it would on a tract that gets a ton of pressure.